Sunday, 10 May 2020

PLAN TO ATTACK INDIA WAS MADE IN IRAQ

Islam Comes to India 4


Al-Ḥajjāj, in full al-Ḥajjāj ibn Yūsuf ath-Thaqafī, (born 661, aṭ-Ṭāʾif, Hejaz, Arabia [now in Saudi Arabia]—died June 714, Wāsiṭ, Iraq), the man behind the first islamic attack on India,was one of the most cruel and able provincial governors under the Umayyad caliphate (661–750). He played a critical role in consolidating the administrative structure of the Umayyad dynasty during its early years.
Al-Ḥajjāj was a school teacher in his native town as a young man, but little else is known of his earlier years. He first became publicly active when, in the reign of the caliph ʿAbd al-Malik, he restored discipline among troops being used to repress a rebellion in Iraq. In 692 he personally led troops in crushing the rebellion of ʿAbd Allāh ibn az-Zubayr in Mecca. The brutality with which he secured his victory was to recur during the rest of his public life.



For several years he was governor of the provinces that surrounded Mecca, but in 694 he was made governor of Iraq, which, because of its location and because of the intrigues by various sects there, was the most demanding and the most important of the administrative posts in the Islāmic empire. Al-Ḥajjāj was completely devoted to the service of the Umayyads, and the latter were never fearful of his great power. He was instrumental in persuading the caliph ʿAbd al-Malik to allow the succession to pass to al-Walīd, who, as caliph, allowed al-Ḥajjāj complete freedom in the administration of Iraq. Al-Ḥajjāj did much to promote prosperity in his province. He began to strike a purely Arab coinage that soon replaced older currencies. He stopped the migration of the rural population to the towns in an effort to improve agricultural production, and he saw to it that the irrigation system was kept in good repair.
 Al Hajjaj introduced a uniform version of the Quran. To revive agricultural production and increase tax revenue, al-Hajjaj expelled non-Arab Muslim converts from the garrison cities of Kufa and Basra to their rural villages of origin and collected from them the jizya (poll tax) nominally reserved for non-Muslim subjects and oversaw large-scale canal digging projects. In 701, al-Hajjaj, with reinforcements from Syria, crushed a mass rebellion led by the Kufan Arab nobleman Ibn al-Ash’ath whose ranks spanned the Arab troops, Muslim converts and religious elites of Iraq. Consequently, al-Hajjaj further tightened control over the province, founding the city of Wasit to house the loyalist Syrian troops whom he thereafter relied on to enforce his rule. A highly capable though ruthless statesman, strict in character, a harsh and demanding master, al-Hajjaj was widely feared by his contemporaries and became a deeply controversial figure and an object of deep-seated enmity among later, pro-Abbasid writers, who ascribed to him persecutions and mass executions.  
Arriving at Kufa, al-Hajjaj gave an inaugural sermon at the local mosque that has become famous and is “often cited as an example of Arab eloquence”. The situation he found there was one of disorder. The troops of Basra and Kufa, ostensibly garrisoned at Ramhurmuz under al-Muhallab ibn Abi Sufra had instead, upon the death of Bishr, left the camp and were idling in the cities. In order to restore discipline, al-Hajjaj announced that any man who did not within three days return to the camp would be put to death and his property be left open to plunder. This proved effective, but when he went to the troops to distribute the pay, al-Hajjaj faced another mutiny under Ibn al-Jarud because of making cuts in pay that the troops refused to accept. These problems overcome, al-Hajjaj sent the troops against the Kharijites. In 696 al-Muhallab defeated the Azariqa who had rallied around Qatari ibn al-Fuja’a as their anti-caliph, and in spring 697 another Kharijite leader, Shabib ibn Yazid al-Shaybani, was defeated on the Dujayl river in Khuzistan with the aid of Syrian troops. In the same year, al-Hajjaj suppressed the rebellion of the governor of Mada’in, al-Mutarrif ibn al-Mughira ibn Shu’ba, who had allied with the Kharijites.
These campaigns eradicated the Kharijite rebellion, but came at a cost to his relationship with the Iraqis: the campaigns against the Kharijites were extremely unpopular, and measures like the cuts in pay, according to Hugh N. Kennedy, “[seem] almost to have goaded the Iraqis into rebellion, as if looking for an excuse to break them”] The explosion came in 699: when he had been conferred the governorships of Khurasan and Sistan, al-Hajjaj had given it to al-Muhallab, but in Sistan, the situation was far more unstable, and the country had to be essentially reconquered. An army under the local governor Ubayd Allah ibn Abi Bakra had suffered a heavy defeat against the ruler of the kingdom of Zabulistan, known as the Zunbil, and now al-Hajjaj ordered Abd al-Rahman ibn Muhammad ibn al-Ash’ath, the most pre-eminent member of the Kufan aristocracy (the ashrāf) to lead an army against the Zunbil. This army was drawn from the Kufan soldiery, and such was the splendour of its equipment, or perhaps the “proud and haughty manner of the Kufan soldiers and ashrāf who composed it” (G. R. Hawting), that it became known in history as the “Peacock Army”. This expedition marked the beginning of a rebellion that came close to destroying not only al-Hajjaj’s, but also Umayyad, power in Iraq.
 Al-Hajjaj, sent letter after letter to his commander, demanding an immediate assault against the Zunbil. The tone of these letters was extremely offensive, and he threatened to dismiss Ibn al-Ash’ath and appoint his own brother Ishaq to command the expedition instead. Al-Hajjaj’s harsh tone and unreasonable demands, as well as the army’s evident reluctance to continue such a protracted and arduous campaign so far from their homes, provoked a widespread mutiny, led by Ibn al-Ash’ath himself. The rebel army marched back to Iraq, growing to over 100,000 strong in the process as they were joined by other malcontents, and being transformed from a mutiny against al-Hajjaj—denounced as an enemy of God and a latter-day Pharaoh—to a full-blown anti-Umayyad movement. 


Seal of Hajjaj

Al-Hajjaj tried to stop the rebels at Tustar, but the rebels were victorious (early 701). Al-Hajjaj abandoned Basra to the rebels, and Ibn al-Ash’ath entered the city in triumph. Reinforced with Syrian troops, al-Hajjaj managed to score a minor victory, after which the bulk of the rebel army left Basra for their natural stronghold, Kufa. Al-Hajjaj recaptured Basra and pursued Ibn al-Ash’ath to Kufa, encamping near the city. Ibn al-Ash’ath’s progress had sufficiently alarmed the Umayyad court that they sought a negotiated settlement, even though they kept sending Syrian reinforcements to al-Hajjaj. Abd al-Malik offered to dismiss al-Hajjaj, appoint Ibn al-Ash’ath as governor over one of the Iraqi towns, and raise the Iraqis’ pay so that they received the same amount as the Syrians. Ibn al-Ash’ath was inclined to accept, but the more radical of his followers, especially the scholars known as qurrāʾ, refused, believing that the offered terms revealed the government’s weakness, and pushed for outright victory. The two armies eventually met in the Battle of Dayr al-Jamajim in April 701, which resulted in a crushing victory for al-Hajjaj and his more disciplined Syrians. Kufa surrendered after that, and al-Hajjaj further undercut Ibn al-Ash’ath’s support by promising amnesty to those who surrendered, providing however that they acknowledged that their rebellion had been tantamount to renouncing Islam; those who refused were executed.
 In 702 al-Hajjaj founded the city of Wasit, situated midway between Basra and Kufa, where he moved his seat. Al-Hajjaj was now the undisputed master not only of Iraq, but of the entire Islamic East.As governor of Iraq and viceroy of the East, al-Hajjaj supervised a major wave of expansion. He appointed Muhammad ibn al-Qasim al-Thaqafi to lead the conquest of northwestern India, Qutayba ibn Muslim to conquer Transoxiana, and Mujja’a ibn Si’r to Oman.
Al-Hajjaj died in Wasit in May or June 714 at the age of 53 or 54; The cause of his death, according to the medieval historian Ibn Khallikan (d. 1282), was a stomach cancer.
Al-Hajjaj killed four companions (sahaba) of Muhammad, Abd Allah ibn al-Zubayr, Jabir ibn Abd-Allah, Sa’id ibn Jubayr and Kumayl ibn Ziyad. While besieging the city of Mecca, Al-Hajjaj crucified Abd Allah ibn al-Zubayr and said, “No one can take down his body except Asma (daughter of the late caliph Abu Bakr); she must come to me and ask permission of me, and only then will his body be taken down”.
He is recorded by Tha’ālibī (Laţ’āif, 142) as one of the four men to have killed more than 100,000 men (the others being Abu Harb, Abu Muslim and Babak). It was mostly due to his numerous campaigns and the many uprisings and revolts against the empire during his reign.

THE WORLD IS ONE FAMILY,BE HAPPY

Two Eternal Mantras of Hinduism
In these trying times, we Indians have to remind the world,the two eternal mantras of Hinduism.
Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam is a Sanskrit phrase found in Hindu texts such as the Maha Upanishad, which means “the world is one family” .The original verse appears in Chapter 6 of Maha Upanishad VI.71-73..Also found in the Rig Veda , it is considered the most important moral value in the Indian society. This verse of Maha Upanishad is engraved in the entrance hall of the parliament of India.
The full version of this prayer is stated as follows:
अयं बन्धुरयं नेति गणना लघुचेतसां उदारचरितानां तु वसुधैव कुटुम्बकं 
ayam bandhurayam neti ganana laghuchetasam udaracharitanam tu vasudhaiva kutumbakam
Only small men discriminate saying: One is a relative; the other is a stranger. For those who live magnanimously the entire world constitutes but a family.
The Full version of Loka Samastha Sukhino Bhavanthu is:
स्वस्तिप्रजाभ्यः परिपालयंतां न्यायेन मार्गेण महीं महीशाः ।
गोब्राह्मणेभ्यः शुभमस्तु नित्यं लोकाः समस्ताः सुखिनोभवंतु ॥
ॐ शान्तिः शान्तिः शान्तिः |
svastiprajābhyaḥ paripālayantāṁ nyāyēna mārgēṇa mahīṁ mahīśāḥ ।
gōbrāhmaṇēbhyaḥ śubhamastu nityaṁ lōkāḥ samastāḥ sukhinōbhavantu ॥
ōm̐ śāntiḥ śāntiḥ śāntiḥ ॥
This phrase is from one of the Mangala Mantra often recited after a pooja or religious ceremony . The origin of the Lokakshema, often called the Mangala Mantra, is obscure. While some yoga practitioners and Hindu scholars erroneously point to the Rig Veda or the invocation of the Katha Upanishad, the only written attribution or textual source of “lokah samastah sukhino bhavantu” seems to be stone inscriptions from the Rulers of the Sangama Dynasty (1336 A.D.-1485 A.D.)
See the play on words. Loka Samastha is reversed and Samastha Loka appears in the next sentence.
This is the beauty of Hinduism. Literary dexterity rooted in profundity, it’s never just for effect.
Sukhino Bhavantu (be happy) remains the same in both the lines of this mantra.
Loka samastha means “all the people in the world ” (Lokah has two meanings in Sanskrit, one: people; and the other: world).
Samastha loka takes a leap from the individual to the universal. It means all the worlds. Not just this earth; His abode, even other worlds which are not seen by the ordinary mortal vision.
So it means. Let all the people in the world be happy. Let all the worlds be happy.
What a noble sentiment! Vedic rishi has given to us to uplift us.
The World is One Family; Be Happy
This mantra is the Vedic mantra of highest well-wishing, highest inclusiveness, highest blessing. By chanting this mantra, we break our egoistic boundaries and wish the world (s)well. And this is really apt because no one can prosper unless others prosper too. If you alone are happy, your happiness cannot be lasting. Because, if you alone are happy, those around you and farther away from you, who are not happy, will be jealous, covetous, rivalrous. However, if they are happy too, there can be kind feelings towards each other. This is a mantra elegantly embodies maitri (loving kindness) and compassion. A compassionate lens. It reminds us that we are a part of the universe and can positively impact all of creation.
Let us chant this daily.
लोकाः समस्ताः सुखिनो भवन्तु, समस्त लोकाः सुखिनो भवन्तु
The Hindu religion which is born out of the principles of the Sanaathana Dharma, considers the whole world as a single family – “Vasudhaiva Kutumbam”.
In a single family, generally speaking every member of the family , desires the welfare and wellbeing of all the members of the family.This is a universal truth all over the world in all continents , among all religions and among all cultures of all races and regions of all people the of the world.
At the end of any function, people generally wish the welfare of a class of people. But the Sanaathana Dharma Saampradaayam wishes the welfare of :All the living beings (both human and non-human /animals of the whole world). It doesn’t end there. It wishes the welfare of :
All mountains, rivers, oceans and every atom in the world. That is the greatness of that slogan :
Lokaah Samasthaah Sukhino Bhavanthu”.

Thursday, 7 May 2020

A K ANTONY, ANIL AND THE DEFENCE BETRAYAL

Questions On a Defence Portal
Anil K Antony, according to business sites, is a Venture Architect, Technology Evangelist and Social Entrepreneur. He is the Executive Director of Cyber India (www.cyberindia.org), a think tank in cyber security and surveillance technologies and the Vice President and a member of the board of trustees of Navoothan Foundation (www.navoothan.org), a non-profit focusing on healthcare and empowerment of women. 

It doesn’t end there-Anil is the son of former Union Minister for Defence, A K Antony, and he is the Convener of the digital cell of the Congress. Something very curious happened after the emergence of the Sprinklr controversy in Kerala. Anil K Antony’s name was taken off the website of Cyber India.

But any number of internet searches will tell you he is its executive director. Cyber India has its primary office in California, and it has offices in New Delhi and Bengaluru.
Cyber India website

Why his name was taken off?

Just going to the site of Cyber India will reveal the truth: four high-placed Americans are there on the board of Cyber India. They are: General Wesley K Clark
Retired four-star general, US Army., Former Supreme Allied Commander, Europe, NATO., and Former Democratic U.S. Presidential Candidate (2004 Primary).  James Lee Witt, Former White House Cabinet member, Michael McNerney, Founder of Efflux, and N MacDonnel "Don Ulsch.

Wesley Kanne Clark, Sr. is a retired general of the United States Army. He graduated as valedictorian of the class of 1966 at West Point and was awarded a Rhodes Scholarship to the University of Oxford, where he obtained a degree in Philosophy, Politics and Economics. He later graduated from the Command and General Staff College with a master’s degree in military science. He spent 34 years in the U.S. Army, receiving many military decorations, several honorary knighthoods, and the Presidential Medal of Freedom.

Wesley Clark

Clark commanded Operation Allied Force in the Kosovo War during his term as the Supreme Allied Commander Europe of NATO from 1997 to 2000.

Clark joined the 2004 race for the Democratic Party presidential nomination as a candidate in 2003, but withdrew from the primary race in 2004, after winning the Oklahoma state primary, endorsing and campaigning for the eventual Democratic nominee, John Kerry. Clark leads a political action committee, “WesPAC”, which he formed after the 2004 primaries and used to support Democratic Party candidates in the 2006 midterm elections. Clark was considered a potential candidate for the Democratic nomination in 2008, but, on September 15, 2007, endorsed Senator Hillary Clinton. After Clinton dropped out of the presidential race, Clark endorsed the then-presumptive Democratic nominee, Barack Obama. 

Clark served as a co-chairman of Growth Energy, an ethanol lobbying group, and is on the board of directors of BNK Petroleum. Between July 2012 and November 2015, he was an honorary special advisor to Romanian prime minister Victor Ponta on economic and security matters.

James Lee Witt, Former White House Cabinet Member and Director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) under President Bill Clinton, has strong relationships and is respected across the aisle, by both Democrats and Republicans.

Anil Antony

Witt was born in Paris, Arkansas, and was raised in Dardanelle, in Yell County, Arkansas. He and Clinton met as boys in Little League.[He founded a construction business in 1968. At 34, he was elected County Judge of Yell County. Witt was re-elected to the post six times and was recognized by the National Association of Counties for his work. Witt was a charter Board Chairman of Child Development Inc., which works to advance Head Start programs.

In 1988, shortly after being reelected county Judge, an administrative position he had held for ten years, Witt was appointed by then-Governor Bill Clinton to be the head of the Arkansas Office of Emergency Services. 

James Lee Witt

There he reorganized the state’s emergency management process. Clinton subsequently moved the new Fire Protection Services Program to OES, including the board and the grant program, which was administered in conjunction with the state Insurance Department.

When Clinton was elected President, he appointed Witt to head FEMA, for which Witt was confirmed by the U.S. Senate in 1993. In 1996, FEMA was given cabinet rank. 

Michael McNerney, Co-founder and CEO of Efflux Systems, a cybersecurity startup focusing on post-breach analytics and incident response.

Michael is a technology entrepreneur and military veteran with a primary focus on cybersecurity. He currently works as the Chief Operations Officer of cybersecurity insurance startup Arceo. Previously, he led the threat intelligence business at Arbor Networks and was the Co-founder & CEO of Efflux Systems, a cybersecurity startup focused on advanced network analytics (acquired by Arbor Networks).

McNerney

Mike has also served as a Cyber Policy Advisor in the Office of the Secretary of Defense, where he drafted and negotiated key pieces of federal legislation through the congressional process and worked with the defence industry, internet service providers and tech companies to develop cybersecurity programs. Prior to that position, Mike worked in the U.S. State Department, where he pioneered rule of law and economic development programs in the Middle East and Afghanistan.

Mike is an affiliate at the Stanford Center for International Security and Cooperation, the Chair & Co-founder of Technology for Global Security, and a Board Member of Vets-in-Tech. He graduated from the University of California, Davis, and earned his J.D. from American University, Washington College of Law.

Don Ulsch has decades of experience in the fields of cyber forensics, cybercrime, national security, cyber risk, regulatory compliance and stress testing, cyber geopolitics, and cyber insurance. He is Principal, MacDonnell Ulsch Cyber Advisory LLC, Guest Lecturer on Cyber Warfare, US Military Academy at West Point.

He provides executive cybersecurity risk management advisory and strategic research services to clients on cyber warfare, cyber espionage, cyber insurance, and defensive measures to reduce the impact of cyber attacks from hostile nation-states and transnational organized crime. The Firm’s clients include law firms with cybersecurity and privacy practices, Artificial Intelligence and cyber security companies, as well as Fortune companies.

Ulsch

As a consultant, he served as Chief Executive Officer at Cyber 20/20 Inc., a technology company specializing in Machine Learning and Deep Learning enabled cyber threat hunting. Cyber 20/20 provides advanced Artificial Intelligence cyber threat hunting capabilities to the US military and US national security organizations, and to the commercial sector.

Previously, he was Senior Managing Director of Cybercrime and Cyber Insurance at PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and was the Chief Executive Officer at ZeroPoint Risk Research LLC. He has conducted cyber investigations in 70 countries and was the past co-chair of the American Bar Association Privacy Committee.

These four people are big shots in the US. 

And, the Chairman of Cyber India is former Chattisgarh Governor Shekhar Dutt. He was Defence Secretary for one year while A K Antony was the Defence Minister. Prior to that, he was Joint Secretary of the Department of Defence Production. In July 2007, Dutt retired as Defence Secretary and was appointed Deputy National Security Advisor for a two-year term. On 23 January 2010, he assumed the office of the Governor of Chhattisgarh, the post to which he served till his resignation on 18 June 2014. Antony was Defence Minister during 2006-2014.

Executive Director of the firm, Vishal Verma is a Senior General Partner at Edgewood Ventures, LLC. and their group companies. Edgewood is an investment fund focusing on the United States and India. Another team member Srinivas Moramchetty has close to 2 decades of experience in Information Technology and IT Regulatory Compliance and holds a Master of Science degree in Industrial Engineering from the New Jersey Institute of Technology.

Shekhar Dutt

Cyber India was known as a start-up ventured by Anil Antony. The company, according to its site, is a platform for some of the pioneering organizations and individuals working in the field of cybersecurity solutions, collaborating with a common mission of keeping our digital landscape secure. Cyber India team provides strategic insights, technological solutions, training and educational programs, and policy solutions, and acts as a knowledge resource to private and public sector organizations including the defence sector, with the primary motive of enhancing our cyber readiness and resilience at any level – be it local, regional, or national.

So, according to them, they act as a knowledge resource to even the defence sector. 

I am not casting doubts here that they are able to provide defence solutions, because A K Antony was the Defence Minister or Anil Antony came into contact with Wesley Clark, the NATO Commander through the defence channel. I am not alleging that Indian defence data leaked through Cyber India to the US.

But Anil Antony and his father A K Antony should answer the nation, why they are in the company of US defence personnel. And why Anil’s name has been withdrawn (maybe temporarily) as executive director.

I hope leaders like Shashi Tharoor will train their guns against Cyber India. Data is not only important, but they are also sacrosanct.


© Ramachandran 

Great Works Written in Lock Down

Lock Down brings to mind great works written in jail.
Prison literature is a fully formed genre. While locked up many people find the reflexive outlet of writing a way to pass the monotony. Others find that they feel they must write to express some wrong, either against themselves or others. While imprisonment has been the cause of great works, such as The Gulag Archipelago of Solzhenitsyn, this list will focus on those works actually composed within prisons or jails.

1. Boethius: Consolation of Philosophy

“While I was thus mutely pondering within myself, and recording my sorrowful complainings with my pen, it seemed to me that there appeared above my head a woman of a countenance exceeding venerable…”

The Consolation of Philosophy

When it comes to literary works composed in prison there is no choice but The Consolation of Philosophy for the first place, to my mind at least. Ever since it was published the work has been influential. Translated from Latin into English by King Alfred, Chaucer and Queen Elizabeth I, the book serves as a warning to those in power. Boethius was at the pinnacle of power in Rome after the collapse of the Western Empire. Unfortunately he fell foul of Theodoric the Great and was imprisoned. This sudden change in fortune is what prompted Boethius to write this philosophical dialogue between himself and the Goddess Philosophy. Boethius feels aggrieved that he has had everything taken away from him. Philosophy leads him by questioning to consider whether anything outside of himself was ever truly his to begin with. I’ll admit not everyone finds Philosophy’s words all that consolatory but it remains a foundational text for Western civilization.

2. Le Morte d’Arthur: Thomas Malory


“Whoso pulleth out this sword of this stone and anvil, is right wise King born of all England.”
England has a rich history of Arthurian mythology which has inspired writers for hundreds of years. While imprisoned Thomas Malory wrote, using French sources, the most famous version of Arthurian legend. We are not entirely sure of the biography of Malory, there are several competing candidates for the identity of the author, but we know from the work itself that it was composed in prison. Le Morte d’Arthur has given the world some of the best known images of Arthur, such as the pulling of the sword from the stone and the Lady of the Lake, her arm covered in shimmering samite.

3. Prison Epistles: Paul

“I therefore, a prisoner for the Lord, urge you to walk in a manner worthy of the calling to which you have been called, with all humility and gentleness, with patience, bearing with one another in love, eager to maintain the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace.”


Paul was the first, and most influential, Christian theologian. He started out as a persecutor of Christians but, after an encounter with Jesus on the road to Damascus, Paul became one of the most vocal supporters of Christianity. His letters proved so important to Christian theology that they were incorporated into the canon of the New Testament. While Paul was spreading faith in Jesus as the messiah he caused much consternation. After a confrontation in Jerusalem Paul was arrested and held in prison. Here he wrote several important letters to Christian communities – The Colossians, the Ephesians, the Philpians and one letter to Philemon. There is some scholarly debate over whether Ephesians and Colossians are genuine Pauline epistles but are still held by most Christians as part of the canon. Paul’s letters were later closely read by Martin Luther and Pauline theology was a major driving force behind the Catholic/Protestant schism.

4. Letter from Birmingham Jail: Martin Luther King Jr

“My Dear Fellow Clergymen:
While confined here in the Birmingham city jail, I came across your recent statement calling my present activities “unwise and untimely.” Seldom do I pause to answer criticism of my work and ideas…”

We can be glad that King did pause to answer his critics because the letter he wrote from jail, where he was held for protesting without a permit, is a ringing vindication of the rights of all people. Bonhoeffer, as a profound theologian, can sometimes speak in terms whose meaning eludes us. This letter talks to everyone; Christian or not. King’s letter was written in response to eight local clergymen who published a letter, A Call for Unity, which called for African-Americans to press their case for equal rights through the courts and not by demonstrations. Dr King responds calmly and, in a fairly brief space, sets out all the reasons that it is impossible for a man of conscience to allow injustice to continue. This is the best document for understanding the greatness of King’s leadership. If I were subjugated by such injustice would I be able to meet it with such reason, determination, and forgiveness? But it is not just a call to those suffering discrimination personally, we must all be responsible for guaranteeing the rights of others.
“Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.”

5. Letters and papers from prison: Dietrich Bonhoeffer

“Mere waiting and looking on is not Christian behavior. The Christian is called to sympathy and action, not in the first place by his own sufferings, but by the sufferings of his brethren, for whose sake Christ suffered.”
Bonhoeffer had the many chances to lead an easy life. He was born into middle-class comfort in 1906 Germany. He might have followed his father in medicine or pursued music. Instead Bonhoeffer studied theology and did pastoral work in Harlem to become a pastor. When the Nazis took political power they also forced cooperative into positions of power. Bonhoeffer and other liberal churchmen form their own communion. He had many chances to move abroad and avoid persecution but, after intense internal debate, he chose to be in Germany for the duration of the war. Bonhoeffer was arrested in 1943 and held until just 23 days before the end of the war, when he was hanged. During his imprisonment Bonhoeffer wrote widely and this collection of his letter and papers contains much that is worth studying even if the finer details of Christian theology are not your cup of tea.

6. The Travels of Marco Polo: Rustichello de Pisa


Marco Polo left Italy with his father and uncle in 1271 and returned in 1295. In those years of travel Polo traveled to the then poorly understood Far East. On Polo’s return to Italy he was captured by the Genoese and held captive. While in prison he related his adventures to fellow prisoner Rusticello de Pisa. Rustichello wrote down what he heard and soon copies of the tale spread throughout Europe. For centuries the Travels of Marco Polo were the best information the West had about China. While Polo’s account can be questioned in some aspects of veracity it has certainly proved influential. Contact with China had existed (certainly in trade in the days of ancient Rome) before Polo but with the dissemination of his book fascination with the ‘exotic East’ was born. Other Europeans had travelled to China before Polo but none left as detailed an account, perhaps a jail term to write would have secured them a place on this list.

7. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus: Ludwig Wittgenstein

“What we cannot speak about we must pass over in Silence.”
It is tempting to do just that with the Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. It is undoubtedly one of the most influential philosophical works of the 20th century, and so is well deserving of a place on this list. It is also undoubtedly a work which requires multiple readings to start to come to grips with. Wittgenstein started makes notes for the Tractatus while a soldier in the First World War. He completed it while held prisoner by the Allies at the end of the war. Part of the difficulty in reading the Tractatus is Wittgenstein’s style; he uses short declarations and sub-clauses to state his views, with very little in the way of argument.

8. The History of the World: Walter Raleigh

“Whosoever, in writing a modern history, shall follow truth too near the heels, it may haply strike out his teeth.”
Raleigh, we may take it from the statement above, would not be welcomed by academic historians today but his unfinished history of the world is a masterpiece. Raleigh traces the history of the world from creation to the third Macedonian war in 168BC. The book serves to show how again how a man’s mind, though his body is held captive, can travel over time and space. Raleigh never finished his history though he was released, and was later beheaded. His history includes this meditation on death.
“O eloquent, just and mighty death… thou hast drawn together all the far stretching greatness, all the pride, cruelty, and ambition of man, and covered it all over with these two narrow words Hic Jacet [Here Lies].”

9. De Profundis: Oscar Wilde

While Lovelace found love set him free it was, for Wilde, love which led to confinement. After a serious of trials relating to his relationships with Lord Alfred Douglas and other men Wilde was sentenced to two years hard labor for gross indecency. While held in prison in Reading Wilde composed a long letter to Douglas which was later published posthumously as De Profundis. The work starts with an account of Wilde and Douglas’ relationship and how damaging it has been to Wilde. The tone is not accusatory but self-revelatory. The letter then turns towards the realizations that prison has forced on Wilde. Wilde ends with his plans for the future for, though we know his life would be cut short, he has learned-


“I have grown tired of the articulate utterances of men and things. The Mystical in Art, the Mystical in Life, the Mystical in Nature this is what I am looking for. It is absolutely necessary for me to find it somewhere.”

10. To Althea, from prison: Richard Lovelace

“Stone walls do not a prison make,
Nor iron bars a cage;”
These are the much quoted first lines of the final stanza of Richard Lovelace’s poem ‘To Althea, from prison.’ Richard Lovelace was one of the dashing young cavalier’s of the English civil war and is classed with the metaphysical poets. Sent to prison for presenting a royalist petition in support of pro-royalist bishops he used the time to compose this, his most famous poem. Written to, a possibly fictional, lover the poem expresses a theme common to much of the literature composed in jail; you cannot imprison the human mind. Despite the walls around him he can imagine his beloved and so he ends the poem with the lines-

“If I have freedom in my love
And in my soul am free,
Angels alone, that soar above,
Enjoy such liberty.”
11. Gita Rahasya: Bal Gangadhar Tilak
Shrimadh Bhagvad Gita Rahasya, popularly also known as Gita Rahasya or Karmayog Shashtra, is a 1915 Marathi language book authored by Indian social reformer and independence activist Bal Gangadhar Tilak while he was in prison at Mandalay, Burma. It is the analysis of Karma yoga which finds its source in the Bhagavad Gita, a sacred book for Hindus. According to him, the real message behind the Mahabharata’s Gita is to act or perform, which is covered in the initial parts rather than renounce, which is covered in the later parts of the epic Gita. He took the Mimamsa rule of interpretation as the basis of building up his thesis.
This book consists of two parts. The first part is the philosophical exposition and the second part consists of the Gita, its translation and the commentary.

The book was written by Tilak in pencil with his own handwriting while being imprisoned at the Mandalay jail from 1908 to 1914. The more-than-400 pages of script was written in less than four months and is hence in itself considered as “remarkable achievement”. Although the writing was completed in the early years of his term, the book was only published in 1915, when he returned to Poona. He defended the ethical obligation to the active principle or action, even violent action including killing, as long as that was selfless and without personal interest or motive.

12. Paradise Lost TranslationMilovan Djilas

Yugoslavian political prisoner Milovan Djilas translated Paradise Lost into Serbo-Croatian in the 1960s while he was imprisoned, writing the epic out on toilet paper with a pencil, and smuggling it out of prison.  
Three hundred and fifty years after it was first published, John Milton’s epic revolutionary poem about the fall of man, Paradise Lost, continues to find relevance around the world, with research revealing that new translations in the last 30 years outnumber the previous three centuries’ output combined 
 First published in 1667, the blank verse Paradise Lost tells “of Man’s First Disobedience, and the Fruit / Of that Forbidden Tree, whose mortal taste / Brought Death into the World, and all our woe, / With loss of Eden.” Milton’s Satan is cast out from heaven with his rebel angels, “Hurld headlong flaming from th’ Ethereal Skie / With hideous ruine and combustion down / To bottomless perdition, there to dwell / In Adamantine Chains and penal Fire”. He goes on to tempt Adam and Eve, and to bring about their expulsion from Eden.  

JESUS AND ASCENSION IN THE WASTE LAND

T S Eliot and Indian Wisdom

“April is the cruellest month, breeding

lilacs out of the dead land, mixing

memory and desire, stirring

dull roots with spring rain.”

Thus begins the trend setting poem, The Waste Land, by T S Eliot.The deeply religious person that he is, Eliot probably wrote, April is the cruellest month, because, Jesus was crucified in April.

But for us who have suffered another pandemic, April is cruel in another sense too.
In the northern hemisphere, April is classically associated with spring-  “breeding lilacs out of the dead land” is a very heavy, depressed way to describe the blooming of flowers. He sees the same things as everyone else, but there is no joy there. A sense of loss and longing, of being rooted in the past, and spring, re-awakening memories of things that have passed.

He further says:

“Winter kept us warm, covering         
Earth in forgetful snow, feeding
A little life with dried tubers.
 ” 

It means, winter was better than spring. He is giving us an insight into a mind that doesn’t revel in these things as might be expected. An old literature teacher once put it thus: when your arm is numb, you don’t feel it. But when the blood flows again, and the pins and needles come, suddenly you know about it. It’s not (emotional) numbness that hurts; it’s the return of feeling. Anyone who has dealt with long-term depression can probably feel the connection to what Eliot is describing here. April is the cruellest month because the life and colour of spring throws one’s depression into stark relief and forces painful memories to surface.

Scholars have said he is invoking Chaucer here.

TS Eliot, by opening the poem with this line about April is ironically playing off of the opening line of The Canterbury Tales by Chaucer, whom he considers as the first true English poet.

Chaucer’s poem, “The Canterbury Tales” begins thus:

“What that Aprille with his shoures soote

The droghte of Marche hath perced to the root

And bathed every veyne in swich licour

Of which virtue gendered is the flour” 

We would read this in modern times as, “When that April with his showers sweet, The drought of March has pierced to the root, And bathed every vein in such liquor, Of which virtue engendered is the flower.”

So, in The Waste Land, he is linking his poem to the great past and the founder of English poetry, Chaucer, but in the process, he is separating April from the notion as the month of Spring renewal of life; this renewal of natural life is opposite to the deadness of hope and spirit, as the “Waste Land” now begins and speaks.  

April is the cruellest month from the perspective of those who have died; even more, from the perspective of those buried and in hell, viewing with regret heavenly spring time. While the winter helped them forget what they lost, April made them see this all too clearly.

The title of this first of five sections is “The Burial of the Dead” which also suggests that this section is about those who have died. Tere are lines which suggest that they are in their graves, covered with warm snow over winter.

Psychiatrists have said that this is a psychiatric speculation. April is when life rebirths, yet it is also the month of the year when the suicide rate peaks among major depression and disorder patients. This is quite paradoxical but completely suits Eliot’s description of the month. It is also known that Eliot’s wife suffered from depression. Depression is not a mild disorder and its progress bears little resemblance to ‘silent implosion’.  


There is an argument that says while he was echoing Chaucer, he was referring to his friend from Paris, Jean Verdenal, who may have died in April, in WW1. There is an association between the lilacs in the poem and a later non-poetic reference to his friend carrying lilacs. More mundanely, spring brings warmth after barren winter but not the fruits of the earth, the crops that are reaped in autumn. This critique suggests that the poem was essentially about personal grief rather than societal decay. Given the state of Europe then, the interpretation of the poem focusing on social decay, is precious.

April is cruel because Jesus was crucified; but it is also the month in which he resurrected.

But did Jesus die at the cross?

In the Fourth Gospel, it is said, two men performed the Office of the Embalming, winding it in linen clothes. The women provided spices and ointments.Both Mathew and Luke say that the Body was taken safely by disciples to a secret hilly place, for embalming. So, the fact is, Jesus didn’t die on the Cross;it  is there in The Bible itself. Do you apply ointments to a dead body?  

Jewish custom doesn’t allow the crucified to hang on the Cross over night. In the letter of the Esseer, in The Crucifixion, emphasis is given to Jesus’ wound on his side. Nicodemus the Physician knew Jesus was not dead because, if Jesus had died, the wound would not have bled for such a long time. Nicodemus sent Joseph of Arimathea, the influential, to Pilate, and he himself went to collect proper drugs, pretending he wanted to embalm the body. 

The wound above the hip was lower down than what is generally believed. No vital organs were damaged.The spear pierced only the skin.His feet was not pierced, as it was not the custom at crucifixions.The earth quake that happened then, electrified Jesus’ nerves. I want to underline the information that Joseph was sent to Pilate. For What? Of Course, to facilitate the rescue operation.

At the time of Jesus, the Tau Cross, in the shape of, ’T’, was used. The Christians think Jesus carried the entire cross, believing the myriad paintings. It was not so.The victim carried only the Platibulum or the cross arm, weighing about 110 pounds or 50 kilograms, to the place of execution.The Stipes, or upright post was permanently fixed there, and the Platibulum was placed in a notch at the top of the Stipes.The victim was never nailed on the palms, the nails were driven between the small bones of the wrist, radial and Ulna. Luke the physician, in his gospel, says, at Gethsemane, Jesus’ sweat became drops of blood. In modern medicine, this is called, Hematidrosis.Under emotional stress, tiny capillaries in the sweat glands can burst.

The crucifixion usually ended with crurifracture, the breaking of the bones of the legs, which prevented the victim from pushing himself upward. The legs of the thieves were broken, but Jesus was spared, thus giving him a chance to survive. The line in the gospel of John, And immediately there came out blood and water, specifies Jesus didn’t suffer suffocation.

The bodily ascension of Jesus to heaven, in Mark and Luke is disproved by Paul’s first letter to the Corinthians (15:5:50): Now this I say, Brethren, that flesh and blood cannot inherit the Kingdom of God, neither doth corruption inherit incorruption. The two disciples present, Mathew and John, doesn’t mention, ascension.

If there is resurrection, there is no sacrifice through death. If Jesus resurrected, he fails in comparison with the sacrifice of Prometheus, who stole fire for the entire humanity from Olympus. A martyr resurrects only in the minds of the humanity. It is better to think Jesus didn’t resurrect, but, he survived.

If Jesus escaped from the cross, what happened to him? He lived in India, in Kashmir. It is another story.

The Waste Land ends thus:

Datta. Dayadhvam. Damyata.

Shantih     shantih     shantih

The poem, thus, ends in India. It leaves eurocentrism, the philosophy of decay, and finds solace in Hinduism. This is from the  Brihadaranyaka Upanishad. The three Sanskrit words mean Restraint, Compassion and Charity.

Lord Brahma, the Creator in the Hindu Trinity, instructs Devas to show restraint (in enjoying pleasures), Asuras to be compassionate, and mankind to be charitable. Mankind has the qualities of both Asuras and Devas, and so mankind should follow all three instructions. If these three instructions were actually followed , so many wars could have been averted. If mankind had embraced self-control and compassion, we wouldn’t be warring all the time.

Shanti  means peace. It is uttered thrice in Shanti mantras invoking the first utterance in the universe, OHM.

Ohm Shantih, Shantih, Shantih.

 

FEATURED POST

BAMBOO AND BUTTERFLY: A MALABAR WOMAN FOR BRITISH RESIDENT

The Amazing Life of a Thiyya Woman S he shared three males,among them a British Resident and a British Doctor.The Resident's British ...