A BRITISH RESIDENT DISCOVERS A GURU

Thycaud Ayyavu Becomes Manager

It was in Madras, as part of his business of supplying goods to a military camp,that Thycaud Ayyavu swamikal came in contact with a British official Atholl Murray MacGregor.When MacGregor later became Resident of Travancore and Cochin,he made Ayyavu the Manager of his Residency in Trivandrum.

 Atholl MacGregor (1836-1922) joined the Madras Civil Service in 1855 and served as the British Resident in the princely states of Travancore and Cochin. MacGregor earned a place in  history as the person who controlled the Mappila Revolt and later served three terms as Resident.He was the son of Sir John Atholl Bannatyne Murray-Macgregor ( 1810-1851),a Scottish Baronet,and colonial administrator, who served briefly as President of the British Virgin Islands in 1851. His mother was Mary Charlotte (died 1896), youngest daughter and co-heiress of Rear-Admiral Sir Thomas Masterman Hardy, 1st Baronet.His brothers included Rear-Admiral Sir Malcolm (1834–1879), who had a career in the Royal Navy and inherited the baronetcy; Sir Evan (1842–1926), a civil servant who became Permanent Secretary to the Admiralty; Alpin (1846–1899), a gentleman usher to Queen Victoria.

MacGregor was Resident thrice:26 February 1867 – 26, May 1867;11 October 1875 – 1877 and 28 March 1879 – March 1881.He belonged to the family of the Duke of Atholl.

When Atholl Murray Macgregor was born on 22 Jul 1836 in Muthill, Perthshire, Scotland, hs father, John Atholl Bannatyne Murray Macgregor of Macgregor, and of Lanrick; 3rd Baronet, Macgregor-201 was 26, and his mother, Mary Charlotte Hardy Hardy-1987, was 23. In 1851 England Census records that Atholl Murray Macgregor was living as a lodger with William and Emma Walton, and was a pupil at the Rectory.Atholl Murray-MacGregor passed away on 2 Mar 1922 in Perth, Perthshire, Scotland, at the age of 85.

He married Caroline Mary Stuart ( Menzies -1847-1906.)They got married on 23 April 1878 in Yorkshire West-Riding, Northumberland, England.She was the Daughter of Robert Menzies 7th Baronet and Ann Balcarres (Stewart-Alston) Menzies.Sadly her mother died only four days after her marriage. They had four children during their marriage; three sons, and one daughter.Sons:John Atholl MacGregor ( 1880-1916),Robert Menzies MsacGregor ( 1882-1946) and Evan Malcolm MacGregor ( 1883-1960).

 In 1891 the family were living at 'Eastwood', Caputh, Dunkeld, Perthshire, Scotland with their three younger children, their eldest son having died during Military service in World War I at the Somme, Picardie, France. By 1901 the family had moved to 'Ardchoille' Kinnoull, Perth, Perthshire, Scotland, where Caroline lived with her husband and two youngest children.

Ayyavu Swamikal was born in 1814 in Nakalapuram in Tamil Nadu. His original name was Subharayan.At the age of twelve, Subharayan received spiritual initiation from two Tamil Saints, Sachidananda Maharaj and Sri Chitti Paradeshi who used to visit his father. They told his family that his life has a specific assignment, he is destined to serve humanity at another place and that when it is time they would come and take him to mould him to fulfil his duty. These avadutas are said to be connected to great siddhas from Tamil Nadu living in Himalayas who knew the science of immortality. When he was 16, the two siddhas took him with them to Palani where he learned advanced yoga. He travelled with them to Burma, Singapore, Penang and Africa. With them he met teachers of many religions and saints. Subbarayan mastered English during his stay and travel with them. He also acquired proficiency in English, Siddha medicine and alchemy during his wanderings with the siddhas.

Thycaud Ayya Swami

At the age of nineteen he was sent back home with instructions to look after his parents and brethren. At home he continued worshiping Goddess and yogic practices, often entering the state of Samadhi. His biographers and disciples state that by this time he had acquired the Ashtasiddhies or divine powers including that of astral travel. Occasionally he visited Pazhani, Chennai and other religious places as part of pilgrimages for participating scholarly discussions going on there. He also started writing and composed 'Brahmothara Khandam' and 'Pazani Vaibhavam'. At the age of 27, as suggested by his gurus he visited Kodungalloor Devi Temple in Kerala. It is said that his devotion was so deep and his prayers were so strong that when he recited the keerthans the temples bells rang by themselves and the doors opened to give him darsan.

He went to Trivandrum during the period of Swati Tirunal Maharaja. The king came to know of his scholarship and expertise in Sivaraja Yoga and invited him to the palace and also learned many things from him.One day while a family gathering related to a marriage was going on at the house where he stayed a very old lean women told him that someone will be coming to meet him from his village and asked him to go to the traveller's shed near by on that night. The Goddess gave darsan to him at that travellers' shed that night. Later Thycaud Devi Temple was constructed at this site. Before long he went back to Tamil Nadu.

Within a few months his father left to Kasi. The whole responsibility for the family fell on his shoulders and he started a business to support his family. In accordance with the direction of his guru, Subbarayan got married. He used to deliver spiritual discourses at Madras.He also supplied goods to a military camp there,where MacGregor was employed.

MacGregor became fond of this English speaking Tamil villager and established a friendship with him. He was interested in Indian religion, language and culture and he became his student. During the reign of Maharaja Ayillyam Thirunal, Atholl MacGregor became the Resident of Travancore. When the selection of a manager for Residency came he appointed him as the Manager of his Residency in Thycaud in 1873. 

Ayya was guru to both Chattampi Swami and Narayana Guru.In the biography of Ayya published by Kalady Parameswaran Pillai in 1960, Pazhaniya Pillai author and son of Ayya Swamikal writes:

“ On Chithrapaurnami day of 1055 ( 1880) my father chanted “Balasubramanya manthra” to Nanu Guru. After completing the “SivarajaYoga Sadhana” Narauana Guru went for meditation ….. Kunjannan (Chattmpi Swamikal) and Nanuannan (Nanu Guru) described and worshiped my father as “Siva” (page 78).

Ayya used to say that any saint can install idols in temples. Ayya Vaikundan too was the disciple of Thycaud Ayya Swamikal. The rebel Vaikundan was relapsed from jail by the advice of Ayya to Maharaja. Vaikundan a ccepted the title of Ayya and the turban of Ayya Swamikal. He introduced installation of mirror as idols in temple. Later Sri Narayana Guru followed Ayya Vaikundan and founded “kannadi temple” in Kalavamkodam, Alapuzha.

When Ayya started “panthibhojan” (inter-dining) with Ayyankali the upper caste leaders ridiculed Ayya as Pandipparyan” and “Mleschan”. Then Ayya told them that,

“intha ulakithile ore oru……..” Sri Narayana Guru later translatesd it into Malayalam.

Thus the slogan “oru jathy,oru matham….” was born ( page 114-115 ).

Ayya was an ardent practitioner and Acharya (Guru) of the ancient Shivaraja Yogic system and stands in the traditions of Tamil Sidhas like Agasthyar, Bhogar, Manikkavachakar, Thirujnanasambandhar, and Thirumoolar.He was the Guru of other monks like Kollathamma, Swayam Prakasha Yogini Amma, Thackalai Peermohammed Sidhan, Makkadi Lebba, Fr. Pettayil Fernandaz, Sri. Ayyan Kali, Manonmanium Sundaran Pillai.He was born and brought up in Chennai. His ancestors were great Shaiva Yogis and Vedanthis. In childhood itself he had the opportunity of getting blessings of his Gurus, Sri Chatti Paradesi and Sri Satchithananda Maharaj, (the Tamil saints of Sage Agasthyar order). He had traveled with them between the age of 16 and 19 and learnt higher yogic techniques including aastral travel.

Ayya was an alchemist too-Alchemy, ie, preparing a tincture of mercury and sulphur, can afford to expand the lifespan to 150-200 years. Mercury was viewed as the seminal seed of Shiva. It formed a part of the alchemical triad of mercury, sulphur and air, corresponding to the trinity of moon, sun, and wind. Breath controlled through the practices of Pranayama, transformed the body's winds into a spiritual mediator that could unify the solar and lunar currents within the body. Much like the alchemical process applied air to mercury and sulfur to form the amalgam that brought the work to completion. Consciousness was seen to ride the vehicle of breath into union with the absolute in the Sahasrara Chakra at the top of the head. TheYogi could, through the intercession of the Goddess, placated by manipulation of the breath, expand consciousness to the point where it becomes what is called the Maha Chitta or "Great Awareness" which is the God Shiva himself.

Towards the end of his life, Ayya guru was obsessed with alchemy. It is said that like many yogi’s of the time, he had conducted experiments to make gold out of copper.An European spy was send to keep an eye on him,but Ayya failed to make gold.

W W Strickland,a British anarchist,who was in Travancore in 1908,wrote a book,Travel Letters from Ceylon,Australia and South India.

One day Ayya guru was very impatient and restless, walking round and round.  Strickland asked him what the matter was. The guru told him that he was expecting two of his disciples who had gone to meditate at Maruthwamala to bring a certain plant which he needed for some experiment. After some time two boys entered the scene. The guru eagerly asked, "Did you bring what I had asked you to bring ?"

The senior of the two boys with some hesitation said "We have brought what you wanted" and took out something from his mundu and placed it on the table. It was a gold coin which probably they had purchased from the market. The guru's face became red with anger. Seeing this, the boys made a quick exit. The spy asked, "Sir, you should be happy since they have gifted you a gold coin. Why are you angry ?"

Then the guru said, "They are making fun of me. They think I am greedy for gold. They do not understand my real purpose. What I need is a certain plant for an alchemical experiment which requires this plant. The plant is only for cleaning the brass coin. The real transmutation process is psychical". The spy grabbed the golden opportunity. He offered to bring the plant. The guru at first was reluctant, saying that being a foreigner he may not be able to converse with the local people and get the plant. But the spy was very enthusiastic and at last the guru told him the name of the plant. The spy hired a horse drawn carriage, went to Maruthwamala and brought a carriage full load of the plant. This pleased the guru and he included the spy in the experiment in place the two boys who never showed up again.

It was Walter William Strickland,who sent Chempaka Raman pillai to Germany.

It was MacGregor who prepared a list of birds for Logan's Malabar Manual,based on Jerdon's Birds of India.But the Manual records that there are errors in this list.

Visakham Thirunal

V Nagam Aiya,in Travancore State Manual records that MacGregor was impressed with Visakham Thirunal,who succeeded Ayilyam Thirunal on 17 June 1880.MacGregor wrote to him:

" It is a matter of greatest satisfaction that the crown will devolve on one so well settled,as Your Highness is,to excercise an authority on which the welfare and happiness of somany depend.In saying this I do not adopt the mere ordinary courtesy of court language but I express an opinion for which the strongest ground has been afforded by Your Highness's former career and known attainments and principles...I am firmly of opinion that few princes have ever succeeded to a throne with more opportunities earning a great name ,and if Your Highness devotes your talents in singleness of purpose to the good of your subjects,as I believe you will do,the benefit will not be confined to Travancore,but will be reflected far and wide over Hindstan".

Visakham Thirunal was there for five years only- At the age of nine he started his English education under Subba Row, who later became Dewan of Travancore. He also wrote in The Statesman and the Calcutta Review.

In 1861 the prince visited Madras and met with the Governor, Sir William Denison, upon whom he made such a favourable impression that the Governor remarked that "He is by far the most intelligent Native I have seen; and if his brother is like him, the prospects of Travancore are very favourable."

The Maharajah's elder brother, Ayilyam Thirunal, died after ruling Travancore for twenty years from 1860 to 1880.Ayilyam and Visakham fought with each other;Visakham Left the Palace and his associate poet Keralavarma Valiya Koyithampuran was made a hostage.Since Ayilyam's reign was full of intrigues,MacGregor's letter assumes special significance.

Travancore Emblem

The Delhi Durbar of 1877, decided to standardize the armorial bearings/royal banners/coat of arms for most Indian States.It was meant to highlight the might of the British Empire, an event marking Queen Victoria's ascension to the title of Empress of India.

On September 02, 1876 a letter reached Resident of Travancore and Cochin, Mac Gregor, from Phillip Hankin at the office of the Viceroy of India,Lord Lytton. Hankin wanted Mac Gregor to find out if the royal families had “quasi Armorial Bearings” or banners that are in use. And if they did, to send the details.

Mac Gregor replied with a little note and two sketches that he had received from the state offices of Travancore and Cochin. Travancore’s state symbol contained the conch shell – the symbol of Lord Vishnu, whose sleeping form, Sri Padmanabhaswamy, was their deity. In early October, a very confused British official sent a letter to Mac Gregor. He drew a rough squiggle meant to represent the conch shell and asked what the meaning of it was. “What is the shape… candlestick or lampstand…”

Mac Gregor responded with detailed sketches of “…the armorial bearings, if it can be called that.”

Neither emblems had any distinct colour but the Calcutta HQ had designed an emblem for Travancore King, a golden-colored conch shell on a blue background. The Dewan had a pea-green flag and in Alapuzha, the Dewan’s Chief Supervisor had made him a banner with a white conch shell within a red oval.A confused Mac Gregor wanted the capital of Travancore to settle the matter, but expected a telegram with clarifications to find him before he got there.A telegram reached Mac Gregorin time. In it was the detail the British wanted confirmed – the emblem was the conch. The national colour would be a light yellow, as preferred by the king. Yellow was Lord Vishnu’s colour.

Henry Edward Sullivan, In Charge of the Inam Department in Madras received a letter from the Calcutta offic,on 17 October. He was told to get the emblems painted:If a vivid description of the colours is available, they can get it done at the Calcutta School of Art. After a month,Mac Gregor realized that thes move was by the Viceroy Lord Lytton ( 1876-1880 ) himself. They were being made for the first of the grand British imperial Durbars in India.In a letter of 21 October , a more developed sketch was sent to Mac Gregor.It displayed the conch shell within a plaque, shielded on both sides by elephants with raised trunks holding different objects.

Kochi Emblem

A month after, Cochin Dewan T Shungoony Menon wrote to MacGregor. He requested the Resident to send his band from Kollam as there were only three bands in Cochin, and the incoming party with the Governor and his wife was large and could not possibly make do with only three bands.Shungoony then provided the details of the Cochin banner, explaining that the King's seal is a conch shell with an umbrella on one side, a traditional lit lamp on the other side and the whole surmounted by a palanquin. The colours of the flag preferred were red and white.The letter made it clear that the King being old would not be attending the durbar.

Lord Lytton

Henry Edward Sullivan became Acting Resident of Travancore during 10 Mar 1877 – Feb 1878.

Lord Lytton,a character in the banner drama,was an extra ordinary human being.

Edward Robert Lytton Bulwer-Lytton, 1st Earl of Lytton,( 1831 – 1891) was an English statesman, Conservative politician, and poet (who used the pseudonym Owen Meredith). He served as Viceroy of India between 1876 and 1880—during his tenure Queen Victoria was proclaimed Empress of India—and as British Ambassador to France from 1887 to 1891.

His tenure as Viceroy was controversial for its ruthlessness in both domestic and foreign affairs: especially for his handling of the Great Famine of 1876–78, and the Second Anglo-Afghan War. Lytton's policies were alleged to be informed by his Social Darwinism. His son Victor Bulwer-Lytton, 2nd Earl of Lytton, who was born in India, later served as Governor of Bengal and briefly as acting Viceroy, and he was the father-in-law of the architect Sir Edwin Lutyens, who designed New Delhi.

The New York Times, reported in 1891:

"Midway on his journey [to India] he met, by prearrangement, in Egypt, the Prince of Wales, then returning from his tour through India. Immediately on his arrival in Calcutta he was sworn in as Governor General and Viceroy, and on 1 January 1877, surrounded by all the Princes of Hindustan, he presided at a spectacular ceremony on the plains of Delhi, which marked the Proclamation of her Majesty, Queen Victoria, as Empress of India. After this the Queen conferred upon him the honor of the Grand Cross of the civil division of the Order of the Bath. In 1879 an attempt was made to assassinate Lord Lytton, but he escaped uninjured. The principal event of his viceroyalty was the Afghan war. "

After turning down an appointment as governor of Madras, Lytton was appointed Viceroy of India in 1875 and served from 1876 to 1880. His tenure was controversial for its ruthlessness in both domestic and foreign affairs.In 1877, Lord Lytton convened a durbar (imperial assembly) in Delhi that was attended by around 84,000 people, including Indian princes and noblemen. In 1878, he implemented the Vernacular Press Act, which enabled the Viceroy to confiscate the press and paper of any Indian Vernacular newspaper that published content that the Government deemed to be "seditious", in response to which there was a public protest in Calcutta that was led by the Indian Association and Surendranath Banerjee.

Dewan Sankunni Menon

Lord Lytton arrived as Viceroy of India in 1876. The rains had been failing in parts of the Madras Presidency since 1875, and the administration's response has been held to contribute to the death toll of between 6.1 million and 10.3 million people.

His implementation of Britain's trading policy has been blamed for increasing the severity of the famine.Critics have contended that Lytton's belief in Social Darwinism determined his policy in response to the starving and dying Indians.Lytton was a protégé of Benjamin Disraeli in domestic affairs, and of Richard Lyons, 1st Viscount Lyons, who was his predecessor as Ambassador to France, in foreign affairs. His tenure as Ambassador to Paris was successful, and Lytton was afforded the rare tribute – especially for an Englishman – of a French state funeral in Paris.

Cochin Dewan Thottakattu Sankunni Menon (21 April 1820 - 1881), also spelt as Shungoony Menon, was an Indian civil servant and administrator who served as the Dewan of the Cochin kingdom from 1860 to 1879. His administration is recognized as a period of development. Sankunni Menon's brother T. Govinda Menon also served as Diwan from 1879 to 1889.

Sankunni Menon was the eldest son of T. Sankara Warrier who had served as the Diwan of Cochin kingdom from 1840 to 1856.Born in Trichur in 1820, Sankunni Menon had a good English education and joined the Madras provincial civil service serving as a Deputy Collector in Tinnevely District when he was appointed Diwan of Cochin to succeed Venkata Rao.

The first four years of Sankunni Menon's diwanship were occupied with his handling the intrigues of his deputy, Parameswara Iyer. In 1864, Iyer's patron Ravi Varma IV died and Sankummi Menon took full control of the administration after dismissing Iyer.He opened the Ernakulam Public Library on 1 January 1870 and the Trichur Public Library in 1873.Sankunni Menon retired on 22 August 1879 due to failing health. He was succeeded by his younger brother Govinda Menon.

© Ramachandran 

CHATTAMPI SWAMI'S BRAHMIN GURU

Subbajatapadikal Lived in Kalladaikurichi

We live in an era in which several historians and pseudo secularists invent a non-existent Brahmin monopolization of knowledge, and attack it incessantly. The fact is the majority of the well-known monks including Swami Vivekananda and Aurobindo are not brahmins. In Kerala, two towering figures, Chattampi Swamikal and Narayana Guru were not brahmins.

But Sri Ramakrishna Paramahamsa, who carved out a Vivekananda was a poor brahmin. In India, for a person who seeks knowledge intensely, knowledge was not far away. In Mahabharata, there is an instance where Viswamitra learns Vedanta from a Chandala or Dalit. Viswamitra, incidentally, was not a brahmin. There is even a Vyadha Gita, Gita of the Butcher, in Mahabharata. It is deeper than even the Bhagavat Gita.

Narayana Guru went to Ramanashram at Thiruvannamalai, met Ramana Maharshi got overjoyed and wrote Nirvrithi Panchakam. One becomes a monk, surpassing the frontiers of caste and creed. Hence, Ramana Maharshi, who was born a Tamil brahmin, is not a brahmin at all before a saint like Narayana Guru. Advaita, the basic philosophy of India, speaks against casteism. Hence Sankaracharya wrote, Maneesha Panchakam. A Dalit taught him the essence of Advaita in Kashi.

I began visiting Kalladaikurichi a few years ago after I learned our family deity is Maragathavally Amman at the Kasinatha Temple there. While I am there, I remember Chattampi Swamikal, since his guru, Subba Jatapadikal, lived in Kalladaikurichi. Subbajata Padikal,a Tamil Brahmin, was a vedic scholar.

That he taught Chattampi Swamikal Vedanta is there in the biography of Swamikal by Justice K Bhaskara Pillai.

According to the Census of 1951, Nairs can scarcely be called a community though they are generally classed as Sudra, the fourth and lowest in the rank of the caste system of Hinduism. They got trained in martial arts and formed the army of the rulers of Kerala in early times but by the Middle Ages, they had already become subservient to the Nampoothiri Brahmins into whose hands most of the land had gone. Thus the Naits often became tenants and vassals of the Nampoothiris. A free mingling of the sexes -due to poverty prevalent in the past - and their expensive obligations and ceremonies, their land holdings were small and they were left with only a little cultivation. They felt it was below their dignity to do manual work themselves, they depended for the cultivation of their fields on their tenants.

Guru, Chattampi, Neelakanta Theerthapadar, before Chattampi's Samadhi

For reasons of prestige few Nairs took an active part m industries, trade or commerce, and so they were bypassed by the modern economic development which brought so much wealth to the more progressive classes of India. In this situation, the whole Nair caste in Kerala was in danger of being reduced to a backward community. Fortunately, some very gifted community leaders arose at this time who guided the Nair caste back into prominence Towards the end of the nineteenth century even the Hindu faith had begun to lose its grip on large sections of the population This rigours of the caste system, and other social disabilities which held down large sections of the Hindu population in semi-slavery had led to mass conversions of large numbers to other faiths, particularly, Christianity.

Among the Nairs, it was Chattampi Swamikal who roused them from stagnation, aptly initiating certain religious and social reforms among his community. He rendered great service to the cause of Hindu religion and society, mainly through his social and humanitarian work. At the same time, he was intensely religious and rebellious against Brahminical predominance. He wrote Pracheena Keralam, in which he theorised that the Namputhiris are basically fishermen and their sacred thread is nothing but the fishing thread on the fishing rod.

Kunjan Pillai (which was the original name of Chattampi Swamikal before he became a monk), was born m 1853 in the Ullurkott family, Kolloor, four miles to the north of Trivandrum city. His father was a Namputhiri Brahmin, Thamarassery Vasudeva Sharma from Mavelikara. His mother Nanga Pillai from Kannammoola was a Nair by caste. According to the matriarchal system prevalent in those limes m Kerala among Nairs, Kunjan Pillai became a Nair, taking his mother’s caste. Sharma was jobless. Nanga's family was so poor that although his relatives were clearly aware of the extraordinary talents of the child, they could not afford to give him a sufficient education. Nanga had two other children:Velukutty and Nani.

Owing to the great poverty of his relatives Kunjan had to contribute to the family income at a very early age by collecting flowers in the neighbouring hilly places for the Brahmin ladies who needed them for the temple service. He also collected vegetables. He had no means for proper schooling but he learned to read and write in Malayalam and Tamil from boys of his own age who attended a school nearby His memory was so prodigious that he learned Sanskrit simply by overhearing what was taught m the classes conducted in a Brahmin house.

The teacher one day discovered the little eavesdropper and made a test on his learning. To his surprise he discovered that the boy had mastered all that he had been taught in class, he consequently allowed Kunjan to attend the class without taking any fee from him. Kunjan showed such remarkable talents for learning that at the age of sixteen he was taken to the school of Raman Pillai in Petta. This Raman Pillai was a famous teacher in southern Kerala and the education that he imparted to his pupils was not merely intellectual but practical and adapted to the talents of the students. Raman Pillai soon appointed Kunjan monitor (Chattampi) of his pupils. It was then that Kunjan acquired the name Cliattampi which he was known ever afterwards.

The youth was highly appreciated by all not only for his wonderful capacity for acquiring knowledge but for his remarkable talents m teaching. It was noticed in those days that Chattampi frequently absented himself from school at night. The pupils soon found out that Chattampi was visiting a nearby Bhadrakali temple where he sat for hours lost m meditation. The teacher was highly pleased about the monitor’s love for the Devi and the pupils respected him the more for it.

At this time caste consciousness was very strong in Kerala. It was unthinkable, for instance, that a Nair would go to an Ezhava family and dine with them. Chattampi, however, was convinced that all distinctions of caste and class were man-made and against the divine law. To him, the basic equality of all men was clearly taught in the sacred scriptures of Hinduism. His sharp intellect penetrated the most difficult objects of every science. His memory was so profound. He went to the houses of his Ezhava classmates. He had food with them, he slept in their houses. But he remained a vegetarian and teetotaler. He was a daily visitor at the house of Dr P Palpu. Palpu's elder brother Parameswaran was an important player in Chattampi's gang. Nair's called him, Thottu thinnu nadakunna Thendi-the scoundrel who roams around with the untouchables. Chattampi was adept in sports as well. He was quite proficient m Indian music, played Ganjira at bhajans and mastered without a teacher, the mudras of Kathakali. He became an accomplished painter.

Adhivaraha Perumal Temple, Kalladaikurichi

But his mind was restless despite all his achievements. He was searching for a deeper meaning in his life. For this reason, he began to read Ezhuthachan's Ramayanam and the Mahabharatham and study the Advaita doctrine in the original texts. He read Kaivalya Navaneetham, a Tamil scared text repeatedly. He decided that he needed the guidance of a guru (teacher) to introduce him to the mysteries of Hindu spirituality. They were too deep to be grasped without a spiritual guide. In his search for a guru, he found a sanyasi (monk) in the yard of the temple at Kolloor. The sanyasi taught him a mantra (Balasubramanya mantra — a sacred formula) and went his way. After meditation on this mantra — replete with spiritual power, Chattampi felt his spirits rising and his vitality returning. He even began to cure diseases by anointing the sick with bhasma (sacred ash) and exorcising the possessed.

He wanted to take up the life of a sannyasin, however, the debts he had incurred and the obligation of supporting his mother prevented him from it. Kunjan found it difficult to earn a living. He began to work as an earner of bricks and mud for building construction, which enabled him to support his mother, but soon he found this manual work too heavy and had to give it up. For many days he served as a labourer carrying building materials for the construction of the Government Secretariat building in Trivandrum. For some time he worked as a document writer and also as an advocate's clerk. He stood first in a test for clerical posts in Government Secretariat Trivandrum conducted by Sir T Madhava Rao the then Divan of Travancore State. But he left the service after a short while as it curtailed his freedom and prevented his wanderings for spiritual exploitations and research.

He returned home and in 1875, at the age of twenty-one, secured a job in the Registrar’s office at Neyyattinkara. Nor did this job satisfy him. He returned to Trivandrum and Dewan T Madhava Rao appointed him as a government accountant, at a monthly salary of Rs 4 but was given Rs 10 assessing his brilliance. He returned the six rupees, saying it is beyond his salary and he doesn't deserve it. Though his poverty was extreme he would not accept a rise in salary, as he wanted no earthly goods for himself. Soon he gave up this job also and joined an association, called Jnanaprajagaram, started by Raman Pillai, which gave asylum to seekers of wisdom and students of religion. He also could learn Tamil from Swaminatha Desikar and philosophy from Professor Manonmaniyam Sundaram Pillai during his participation in Jnanaprajagaram. Thycaut Ayyavu, Manager at Residency was part of the group and he taught the primers of Vedanta and Yoga. He learned wrestling from Tamil books.

Chattampi, 40 days before samadhi

Since the Vedanta texts in Tamil were ancient, he had to acquire knowledge of ancient Tamil grammar. Chattampi approached Swaminatha Desikar, a Tamil Brahmin, who was the Tamil Teacher at Trivandrum College. He used to attend some sessions of the Jnanaprajagaram. Desikar agreed to the request. Chattampi reached Desikar's home every day and learned Tamil grammar. He learned science, Purana and Vedanta books in Tamil. Chattampi got the feeling that Tamil is the quintessential language of all wisdom in the world.He read Kambar, Thirukkural, Pattanathu Pillayar, and Nakkeerar.He got drowned in the Tamil spiritual poetry. He wished for a knowledge pilgrimage across Tamil Nadu.

He also studied English books on philosophy with the help of others. While at Jnanaprajagaram, he studied the ancient works of the Vedanta written in Tamil. His love for Dravidian culture and spirituality increased so much tint he decided to go to Tamil Nadu for further studies. Meeting Subba Jatapadikal, a Tamil Brahmin, was a turning point.

In one of the Philosophical Conferences organised annually by the Travancore Kings at the Palace complex adjacent to Sree Padmanabha Swami Temple Kunjan Pillai met Subba Jatapadikal from Kalladaikurichin in Southern Tamil Nadu; a renowned teacher well versed in Tarka, Vyakarana, Mimasa, and Vedanta. He had come for the Navarathri Scholars meet. Chattampi went along with Swaminatha Desikar and waited on the sidelines of the dais and met Jatapadikal. Desikar introduced Chattampi. Both were impressed by the other and Kunjan's wish to learn at Kalladaikurichin under him was granted. He invited Chattampi to his home in Kalladaikurichi.

Kalladaikurichi is a town on the right bank of the Thamiraparani river in Ambasamudram Taluk of Tirunelveli district in Tamil Nadu, a southern state of India. any Indian rural town, this town too is steeped in tradition and is rich in heritage, but struggling to hold on to its past glories. Here the modern co-exist peacefully with the bullock carts and rickshaws of yesteryears.

Kallidaikurichi's Hindu shrines are of ancient temple architecture style, having high-rise gopurams (ornamental gateways of temples) with sculptures that herald the past glory of this region. Muthuswami Dikshitar, the great Carnatic composer, whose songs abound with geographic and iconographic references, sings of the curative properties of the river Thamiraparani. To him, the Goddess at Tirunelveli is Hima-saila-sutaa (daughter of the mountain snow) and Suddha Thamraparni tatha sthitha.Vishnu is Bhangahara thamraparni Theerastha. The local language is Tamil. Adivaraha Perumal temple represents the principal deity in present-day Kalladaikurichi. Dikshitar has sung a song, Sri Lakshmi Varaham in the raga Abhogi, on the Aadhivaraga Moorthy Swamy. Dikshitar settled in the nearby village Ettayapuram in 1835.

Kothai Adithya Varma the Venad King who ruled during 1469-1484 resided in Kalladaikurichi. The Adhivaraha Perumal Temple was rebuilt by him, retaining the original structure by Kandan Keralan of Kurukenikkollam ( Quilon ) of Malaimandalam ( Kerala ). The King's figure is engraved in the parikrama and the deity is called Aditya Varmeswara. Vishnu is called Veerakerala Perumal, and Parvathi is Nila Sjundari Nachiyar. Krishna is Veerakerala Pillayar. Saivites later removed images of Vishnu and Krishna, but these names remain as inscriptions. 

The Thamiraparni river flows through Kallidaikurichi. Originating from the Pothigai nearby, it flows down to the Bay of Bengal after travelling for about 125 kilometres. In the hills are several waterfalls, such as Courtallam Falls, Banatheertham Falls, Agasthiar Falls, and Manimuthar Falls.

Kalladaikurichi is on the border between the Pandya and the Chera countries of the past. The road, either from the south via Nagarcoil or from the north via Shencottai takes about 164.4 km. A determined and sturdy person can easily climb the bridle paths and move between hills, without undue exertion. The boundary between the Pandya and Chera Kings was subject to frequent changes, this way or that way, depending on who felt the more powerful between the two of them, at any point in time. At times the Pandyas drove deep into Kerala and reached up to Kanetti near Karunagapally. At other times the Cheras went up to Madurai and beyond. At one point the Cheras held in their hands entire south India, for a tantalizing brief period of five years. Kalladaikurichi got accustomed to these changes to her fortune and readily absorbed the characteristics of both streams of culture and language.

Subba Jatapadikal was known as Subbajata Vallabhar in Kalladaikurichi,the town on the banks of the Thamraparni river.His ancestral family had come from Andhra to be the priests of the Tamil Bramins there and they began staying at Koottikkal street. It became the reputed headquarters of the Vedanta scholars in South India. They taught inquisitive students Veda, Vedanta, logic and grammar. None could beat Jatavallabhar in these, in Tamil Nadu. His home was a meeting place of scholars from various parts and the atmosphere was replete with scientific dialogues." Chattampi got knowledge of all sastras in Sanskrit and Tamil from here", Justice Bhaskara Pillai records, "It is the iron that sharpens the iron".

Subbajata Padikal was an expert in chanting Vedic hymns. The suffix Jatapadi was derived from his expertise in chanting Jata Padam, one of the four ways of chanting Vedic hymns.

He used to chair scholarly discussions during Navarathri. Being the guest of the royal family, he stayed inside the palace complex in the Fort.

Jatapadikal had no children.Chattampi became close to him like a son. In Sadguru Sarvaswam, a disciple of Chattampi described that relationship thus:

In the days of childhood and youth of the great sage

Profound scholars from different spheres of knowledge

The enlightened souls who understood his greatness

Like Subbajatapadikal adorned the position of his gurus.

Chattampi spent long hours at Thiruvaduthurai Madam reading ancient texts on Saivism. Unfortunately, he failed to systematically preserve documents in later life.

Chattampi spent almost four years learning under Subba Jatapadikal. There he acquired deep and extensive mastery of all sastras in Tamil and Sanskrit. He also learned Siddha medicine, music, and martial arts. During this period he was greatly influenced by the works of Kodakanallur Sundara Swamikal, a great Advaitin. He later translated his work Nijananda Vilasam containing the cream of Vedanta into simple Malayalam to guide spiritual aspirants.

At Kalladaikurichi,near Ambasamudram, Subbajatapadikal guidcd him in Vedas and Upanishads.He learned to play classical instruments. The learning laid the foundation for Chattampi's future prospects. Close to Jatapadikal's home, a yogi was living in deep meditation. He too blessed Chattampi.

After completing his studies under Subba Jatapadikal he spent long periods of learning under a Christian priest. In a secluded church in Southern Tamil Nadu assisting the priest, he learned Christian meditation and learned Christian Religion and philosophy. Later he lived with an old Muslim well versed in the Qur'an and Sufi mysticism who taught him the main tenet of Islam. Kunjan acquired proficiency in reading Qur'an. Leaving him he wandered for months with many avadutas in Southern Tamil Nadu and also travelled all over India. These days revealed to him that the basic concepts of all religions are the same.

At the end of his wanderings and quest, Kunjan Pillai was led to self-realisation by an avaduta whom he met at a wayside in Vadaveeswaram a village in Tamil Nadu with whom he lived for many months in the forests without any contact with the outside world. It is believed that this avaduta belonged to the line of immortal masters of Southern India; the Siddhas who knew the scientific art of realising God. He returned to Kerala as a great scholar and saint.

In 1882, at the Aniyoor Temple near Vamanapuram, Swamikal met Nanu Asan, later known as Narayana Guru. Asan was three years younger than Swamikal and in search of spiritual guidance. By then Swamikal was well-versed in yoga and spiritual matters and their meeting proved to be the start of a profound and cherished companionship, although the two were of different temperaments. In those days Nanu Asan was a soft-spoken introvert and Swamikal was an outspoken extrovert. They lived and travelled for many months together. Swami introduced Asan to all arts and sciences he had mastered and also gave him the Balasubrahmanya mantra. These were the formative years of Asan, who later became a social reformer. Later Swamikal took Asan to his guru, Ayyavu Swamikal. After completing Asan's studies under Ayyavu Swamikal the men left him and wandered together in southern Tamil Nadu where they met many scholars. They would have together met Subbajata Padikal since Narayana Guru's poems contain the essence of Advaita.

Guru Visited Chattampi before Samadhi

Chattampi Swamikal wrote many guides and commentaries on Vedanta for the common man. Notable among them is Advaita Chinthapaddhathi (1949), an introductory manual on practical Advaita. written in simple language to enable ordinary people without knowledge of Sanskrit to learn Vedanta. The book describes the trigunas, trimurthees, jivatmas, panchabutas, sukshma, sthula, sarirotpatti, dasagunas, prapancholpatti, Tatvamasi, and related Vedic concepts. His Vedadikara Nirupanam is considered one of his greatest works. It refuted the baseless customs and rules that existed in Kerala. For the first time in the region's history, the work questioned the monopolisation of Vedas, sciences and education by a minority. Pracheena Malayalam also aimed at awakening the mind of the people of the region divided by various complexes to a collective sense of 'We'. Convictions of common origin and belief in a common ancestry were indispensable for the development of a collective mindset. Swami explored the roots of Kerala society and original inhabitants, and sociologically and genealogically connected most of the present groups in Kerala including the priestly class to common ancestors who were the original inhabitants known as the Nakas.

Swamikal settled down at Panmana, a village in the Kollam district, towards the end of his life. He attained samadhi on 5 May 1924 after a short illness during which he objected to taking any medicine.

Narayana Guru practised austere Jnana and Yoga under Swamikal during this period. It was with Chattampi Swamikal that Asan made his first trip to Maruthuvamalai, and later to Aruvippuram, which was chosen as his abode for meditation and spiritual activities and which was where he was led to self-realisation. It was after this that he was known as Narayana Guru. Swamikal did not stay there for long, although the two maintained lifelong contact, respect and regard for each other. The poem Narayana Guru composed when he came to know of Swami's samadhi was the only offering he gave to any person and it reveals how he considered Swamikal to be a realised soul.

Both Chattampi and Narayana Guru had another common Guru in Thycaud Ayyavu Swamikal. Thycaud Ayyavu Swamikal (1814 – 1909), also known as Sadananda Swami, was a spiritualist and a social reformer, the first to break customs related to caste in Kerala when caste restrictions and untouchability were at their extreme.

Thycaud Ayya Swami

Ayyavu Swamikal was born in 1814 in Nakalapuram in Tamil Nadu. His original name was Subharayan. His parents were Mutthukumaran and Rukmini Ammal. His father and grandfather Sri Hrishikesan were scholars and experts in yoga and spiritual sciences.

At the age of twelve, Subharayan received spiritual initiation from two Tamil Saints, Sachidananda Maharaj and Sri Chitti Paradeshi who used to visit his father. They told his family that his life has a specific assignment, that he is destined to serve humanity in another place and that when it is time they would come and take him to mould him to fulfil his duty. These avadutas are said to be connected to great Siddhas from Tamil Nadu living in the Himalayas who knew the science of immortality. When he was 16, the two Siddhas took him with them to Palani where he learned advanced yoga. He travelled with them to Burma, Singapore, Penang and Africa. With them, he met teachers of many religions and saints. Subbarayan mastered English during his stay and travelled with them. He also acquired proficiency in English, Siddha medicine and alchemy during his wanderings with the Siddhas.

At the age of nineteen, he was sent back home with instructions to look after his parents and brethren. At home he continued worshipping Goddess and yogic practices, often entering the state of Samadhi. His biographers and disciples state that by this time he had acquired the Ashtasiddhies or divine powers including that of astral travel. Occasionally he visited Pazhani, Chennai and other religious places as part of pilgrimages for participating in scholarly discussions going on there. He also started writing and composed 'Brahmothara Khandam' and 'Pazani Vaibhavam'. At the age of 27, as suggested by his gurus he visited Kodungalloor Devi Temple in Kerala. It is said that his devotion was so deep and his prayers were so strong that when he recited the kirtans the temple bells rang by themselves and the doors opened to give him darshan.

 He went to Trivandrum during the period of Swathi Tirunal Maharaja. The king came to know of his scholarship and expertise in Sivaraja Yoga and invited him to the palace and also learned many things from him. One day while a family gathering related to marriage was going on at the house where he stayed a very old lean woman told him that someone will be coming to meet him from his village and asked him to go to the traveller's shed nearby on that night. The Goddess gave darshan to him at that travellers' shed that night. Later Thycaud Devi Temple was constructed at this site. Before long he went back to Tamil Nadu.

Within a few months, his father left for Kasi. The whole responsibility for the family fell on his shoulders and he started a business to support his family. Following the direction of his guru, Subbarayan got married. He used to deliver spiritual discourses in Chennai. As part of his business, he was supplying goods to a military camp in Chennai, where he came in contact with a British official Atholl MacGregor.

MacGregor became fond of this English-speaking Tamil villager and established a friendship with him. He was interested in Indian religion, language and culture and he became his student. During the reign of Maharaja Ayillyam Thirunal, Atholl MacGregor became the Resident of Travancore. When the selection of a manager for Residency came he appointed him as the Manager of his Residency in Thycaud in 1873. It was MacGregor who prepared a list of birds for Logan's Malabar Manual, based on Jerdon's Birds of India.

As this post was one of the senior-most offices that the British allowed to natives, people respectfully called him 'Superintend Ayyavu'. The term 'Ayyavu' means a respectable or venerable person. Gradually when people understood his yogic powers and scholarship the name changed from Superintend Ayyavu to Ayyavu Swami. Swami kept strict discipline at work and was extremely punctual.

A Page of Pracheena Malayalam

Ayyavu Swamikal visited Vaikunda Swami of Nagarcoil and also the famous Maruthwamalai where he sat in meditation for days. At his residence, he spent most of his time in meditation and in initiating and instructing his disciples in spiritual practices. Ayyavu used to deliver lectures on Bhakti, Yoga and Vedanta in Jnanaprjagaram; where the leading literary, social and spiritual personalities in and around Trivandrum used to assemble discuss and deliver lectures and discourses. He in association with Manonmaniam Sundaram Pillai founded the Saiva Prakasha Sabha of Trivandrum.

He already knew that he had to permanently withdraw from this objective world and enter into Samadhi on that day. When the King knew about his approaching Samadhi he wanted to provide a place for Samadhi near the palace and construct a temple there. But Ayyavu insisted that his Samadhi should be in the Thycaud cremation ground and should be a very simple and small structure. Ayyavu Swami attained Samadhi on 20 July 1909. A Shivalinga was installed over the Samadhi site of Ayyavu Swami in Thycaud in 1943. This temple was improved under the patronage of Sri Chithira Thirunal Maharaja the last king of Travancore. This is now known as Thycaud Siva Temple.

When Ayya Vaikundar (1833–c.1851 )s a 19th-century social reformer and iconoclast who worked for the upliftment of downtrodden people in the Kingdom of Travancore, was arrested by Swati Thirunal, he was released by the King, on the advice of Thycaud Ayya who was the Guru of Swathi Thirunal Maharaj and a disciple of Vaikundar as well. Vaikundar made some controversial statements like mentioning the Travancore king as the ‘Devil in Ananthapuri’ and the British rule as the ‘Rule of White Devils’. Against the background of the growing popularity of Vaikundar and the convergence of people around him in multitudes, a complaint was lodged against him with the king of Travancore. The Travancore king Swati Thirunal arrested Vaikundar in 1838 and imprisoned him at Singarathoppu jail. After 110 days of imprisonment, on March 26, 1839, he was released.

© Ramachandran 

THE BUDDHA AS A HINDU AND MARXIST

The Mystery of the Adi Buddha

I had been to Bodh Gaya.Buddha got enlightenment while meditating underneath a fig tree here.Emperor Asoka's evil queen Tissarakha  thought Asoka was pouring his love and affection to the tree instead of her and used a Mandu thorn to kill the tree in the Mahamega arama.Hindus had been visiting Bodh Gaya since atleast Buddha's own life time.The site was actually maitained by a lineage of Saiva priests.

Why so?

It is because there was a Hindu Buddha.The Adi Buddha,who is considered to be an avatar of Vishnu.

In Lalita Vistara, it is described how Gautama Buddha meditated on the same spot as the predecessor Buddha. The original name of Bodhgaya is Kikata, after Gautama attained enlightment there, it came to be known as Buddha gaya. Even today the rituals of worship is preformed by sannyasis of Sankaracharya sect.

Lankavatara Sutra, the famous buddhist work says that Ravana, King of Lanka first worshipped Vishnu incarnation Buddha then successive and future Buddha.

It is very evident that Purana and Buddhist Chronology does not synchronize with each other, while they seem to be saying about the same person. When Analyzing this question. It becomes apparent that we have merged two Buddhas. The Adi Buddha or Avatar Buddha of Vishnu and Shakya Buddha or Gautama Buddha into One.

Adi Buddha was born on 1887BC to Mother Anjana in Kikata (Bodh Gaya).

He established the Philosophy of Ahimsa, Non Violence. He preached against ritual animal sacrifices that has crept into Vedic Hinduism. He emphasized the divine in all beings and divinity of all souls arousing compassion for all.

Bhagavata Purana says "At the commencement of the Kāli-yuga will Vishnu become incarnate in Kikata, under the name of Buddha, the son of Jina, for the purpose of deluding the enemies of the gods."

Puranas say that Adi Buddha was born in Ikshvaku Dynasty.

Adi Buddha is contemproary of Srenika(Sunika) whose father was Hemajit or Kshemajit or Kshetroja or Ksetrauja. Son of Srenika is Kunika. His son is Dharshaka.

Siddhartha was was born around 560BC in the royal family of Suddhodana and Mayadevi in Lumbini in Nepal. Siddhartha received his name Gautama from his spiritual Master Gautama Muni, who belonged to Kapila dynasty,as per Sundarananda Charita. He left home, his royal comforts to find enlightenment. He went to Bodh Gaya to meditate and got enlightenment.It again means Bodh Gaya was a pilgrimage centre during his time.

Gautama Buddha is the propagator of Bahyatmavada, Jnanatmavada and Sunyavada, three pillars of Atheism. He Went to Bodhgaya to meditate because of its spiritual potency as the birthplace of Adi Buddha.

If Adi Buddha was the contemporary of srenika,as stated above,again confuion arises-Bimbisāra (c. 558 – c. 491 BC or during the late 5th century BC,was  also known as Seniya or Shrenika in the Jain histories.He was a King of Magadha (r. 543 – 492 BC or c. 400 BC and belonged to the Haryanka dynasty. He was the son of Bhattiya,a chieftain. His expansion of the kingdom, especially his annexation of the kingdom of Anga to the east, is considered to have laid the foundations for the later expansion of the Maurya Empire.

He is also known for his cultural achievements and was a great friend and protector of the Buddha. Bimbisara—according to Hiuen Tsang—built the city of Rajgir (Rajagriha), famous in Buddhist writings (others attribute the city's foundation to his successor).He was succeeded on the throne by his son Ajatashatru.

Bimbisara welcomes Buddha

He became a devotee of Jainism impressed by the calmness of Yamadhar (a Jain Muni). He frequently visited Samavasarana of Lord Mahavira seeking answers to his queries.Per Jain scripture, Bimbisara killed himself in a fit of passion, after his son had imprisoned him. Consequently, he was reborn in hell, where he is currently residing, until the karma which led to his birth there comes to an end.It is further written, that he will be reborn as Mahapadma (sometimes called Padmanabha), the first in the chain of future tirthankaras who are to rise at the beginning of the upward motion (Utsarpini) of the next era of time

According to Buddhist scriptures, King Bimbisara met the Buddha for the first time prior to the Buddha's enlightenment, and later became an important disciple that featured prominently in certain Buddhist suttas. He is recorded to have attained sotapannahood, a degree of enlightenment in Buddhist teachings. Although Bimbisara let the women in his palace visit Buddha in his monastery in the evenings; the women wanted a hair-and-nail stupa they could use to venerate the Buddha any time. Bimbisara spoke with Buddha who complied with their requests.

Many biographies of the Buddha begin not with his birth in his last lifetime but in a lifetime millions of years before, when he first made the vow to become a buddha. According to a well-known version, many aeons ago there lived a Brahman named (in some accounts) Sumedha, who realized that life is characterized by suffering and then set out to find a state beyond death. He retired to the mountains, where he became a hermit, practiced meditation, and gained yogic powers. While flying through the air one day, he noticed a great crowd around a teacher, whom Sumedha learned was the buddha Dipamkara. When he heard the word buddha he was overcome with joy. Upon Dipamkara’s approach, Sumedha loosened his yogin’s matted locks and laid himself down to make a passage across the mud for the Buddha. Sumedha reflected that were he to practice the teachings of Dipamkara he could free himself from future rebirth in that very lifetime. But he concluded that it would be better to delay his liberation in order to traverse the longer path to buddhahood; as a buddha he could lead others across the ocean of suffering to the farther shore. Dipamkara paused before Sumedha and predicted that many aeons hence this yogin with matted locks would become a buddha. He also prophesied Sumedha’s name in his last lifetime (Gautama) and the names of his parents and chief disciples and described the tree under which the future Buddha would sit on the night of his enlightenment.

Over the subsequent aeons, the bodhisattva would renew his vow in the presence of each of the buddhas who came after Dipamkara, before becoming the buddha Shakyamuni himself. Over the course of his lifetimes as a bodhisattva, he accumulated merit (punya) through the practice of 6 (or 10) virtues. After his death as Prince Vessantara, he was born in the Tusita Heaven, whence he surveyed the world to locate the proper site of his final birth.

He determined that he should be born the son of the king Shuddhodana of the Shakya clan, whose capital was Kapilavastu. Shortly thereafter, his mother, the queen Maha Maya, dreamed that a white elephant had entered her womb. Ten lunar months later, as she strolled in the garden of Lumbini, the child emerged from under her right arm. He was able to walk and talk immediately. A lotus flower blossomed under his foot at each step, and he announced that this would be his last lifetime. The king summoned the court astrologers to predict the boy’s future. Seven agreed that he would become either a universal monarch (chakravartin) or a buddha; one astrologer said that there was no doubt, the child would become a buddha. His mother died seven days after his birth, and so he was reared by his mother’s sister, Mahaprajapati. As a young child, the prince was once left unattended during a festival. Later in the day he was discovered seated in meditation under a tree, whose shadow had remained motionless throughout the day to protect him from the sun.The later legend is well known.

The Nirvana of Buddha

But the irony is that,for a man who espoused Ahimsa,the end was by eating meat.At age 80 the Buddha, weak from old age and illness, accepted a meal (it is difficult to identify from the texts what the meal consisted of, but many scholars believe it was pork) from a smith named Chunda, instructing the smith to serve him alone and bury the rest of the meal without offering it to the other monks. The Buddha became severely ill shortly thereafter, and at a place called Kusinara (also spelled Kushinagar; modern Kasia) lay down on his right side between two trees, which immediately blossomed out of season. He instructed the monk who was fanning him to step to one side, explaining that he was blocking the view of the deities who had assembled to witness his passing. After he provided instructions for his funeral, he said that lay people should make pilgrimages to the place of his birth, the place of his enlightenment, the place of his first teaching, and the place of his passage into nirvana. Those who venerate shrines erected at these places will be reborn as gods. The Buddha then explained to the monks that after he was gone the dharma and the vinaya (code of monastic conduct) should be their teacher. He also gave permission to the monks to abolish the minor precepts (because Ananda failed to ask which ones, it was later decided not to do so). Finally, the Buddha asked the 500 disciples who had assembled whether they had any last question or doubt. When they remained silent, he asked two more times and then declared that none of them had any doubt or confusion and were destined to achieve nirvana. According to one account, he then opened his robe and instructed the monks to behold the body of a buddha, which appears in the world so rarely. Finally, he declared that all conditioned things are transient and exhorted the monks to strive with diligence. These were his last words. The Buddha then entered into meditative absorption, passing from the lowest level to the highest, then from the highest to the lowest, before entering the fourth level of concentration, whence he passed into nirvana.

In Tibetan Buddhism, the term ādibuddha is often used to describe Samantabhadra, Vajradhara or Kalachakra. In East Asian Mahayana, the ādibuddha is typically considered to be Vairocana.

The Guhyasamāja Tantra says of Vajradhāra, " Vajradhara, the Teacher, who is bowed to by all the Buddhas, best of the three diamonds, best of the great best, supreme lord of the three diamonds."

Alex Wayman notes that the Pradipoddyotana, a tantric commentary, states that the "three diamonds" are the three mysteries of Body, Speech, and Mind. Wayman further writes: "Tsong-kha-pa's Mchan-'grel explains the "lord of body": displays simultaneously innumerable materializations of body; "lord of speech": teaches the Dharma simultaneously to boundless sentient beings each in his own language; "lord of mind": understands all the knowable which seems impossible.

According to the 14th Dalai Lama, the ādibuddha is also seen in Mahayana Buddhism as representation of the universe, its laws and its true nature, as a source of enlightenment and karmic manifestations and a representation of the Trikaya.

Within the Nichiren school of Japanese Buddhism, the Nikko-lineage, specifically the Soka Gakkai and Nichiren Shoshu, regard Nichiren as the Adi-(primal) Buddha and dispute the contentions of other sects that view him as a bodhisattva.

Tibetan thangka of Vajradhara

Sanghyang Adi Buddha is a concept of God in Indonesian Buddhism. This term was used by Ashin Jinarakkhita at the time of Buddhist revival in Indonesia in the mid 20th century to reconcile the first principle of the official philosophical foundation of Indonesia (Pancasila), i.e. "KeTuhanan Yang Maha Esa" (lit. "Recognition of the Divine Omnipotence") that requires the belief in a supreme God, with Buddhism which strictly speaking does not believe in such monotheistic God.This concept is used by the Indonesian Buddhist Council, an organization that seeks to represent all Buddhist traditions in Indonesia such as Theravada, Mahayana, and Vajrayana.

Adi Buddha is a term used in Tantric Buddhism to refer to the Primordial Buddha. The term Sanghyang Adi Buddha is agreed upon and used by the Indonesian Supreme Sangha and the Indonesian Buddhist Council as the designation for the God Almighty. This term is not found in Pāli Canon, but used in some old Indonesian Vajrayana texts such as Sanghyang Kamahayanikan.

Sang Hyang Adi Buddha refers to "the seed of Buddhahood" inside every being. In Mahayana Buddhism, Adi Buddha refers to the primordial Buddha that outlines the same Universal Dhamma.The Adi-buddha is not a monotheistic deity as in the Abrahamic traditions, but is rather the primordial nature of mind, the part of the mind that never enters samsara, and is thus the "primordial Buddha." As the Primordial Buddha never entertains conceptual ignorance or proliferation, all that arises is referred to as "self-liberated."

Indonesian National Encyclopedia (1988) describes Adi Buddha and the traditions that are used this term thus:

"Adi-Buddha is a term for the Almighty God in Buddhism. This title came from the Aisvarika tradition of Mahayana in Nepal, which is spread through Bengal, and became also known in Java. Aisvarika is the term for the disciples of theist view in Buddhism. This word came from 'Isvara' which means 'God' or 'Great Buddha' or 'the Almighty', and 'ika' which means 'follower' or 'disciple'. "

"This term is used by the Svabhavavak Buddhism in Nepal. This school is one of the branch of Tantrayana school of Mahayana. The term for God Almighty in this school is Adi-Buddha. Later, this view also spread to Java in the time of Srivijaya and Majapahit. The present scholars knows this term from the paper of B.H. Hodgson, a researcher who studied the religious in Nepal.

"According to this view, one can coalesce (moksha) with Adi-Buddha or Isvara through his efforts with the ascetic path (tapa) and meditating (Dhyana)."

The use of Sanghyang Adi Buddha as a name for a supreme God is controversial among Indonesian Buddhists to the present day. The reason is that the concept of Sanghyang Adi Buddha, which only exists in Tantrayana/ Vajrayana traditions, is not a god in the sense of a personal god of the monotheistic religions. The use of the name of Sanghyang Adi Buddha as a personal god, is the product of a compromise with political reality, and is contrary to the teachings of Buddhism. Because of this political compromise, Indonesian Buddhism differs from mainstream Buddhism. This controversy also extends to Very Venerable Ashin Jinarakkhita as the originator of the term Sanghyang Adi Buddha as a god in Buddhism.

Mahavamsa traces the Shakya dyansty to Ikshvaku dynasty and starts the dynasty with Ikshvaku.

Threvada Texts refer to six Preceding Buddhas (Those who have been awakened) as Vipasyin, Sikin, krakuccanda, Konagamara and Kashyapa, also they say Maitreya as the Buddha of the future.

Amara Simha, Buddhist scholar, who wrote Amarakosha gives eighteen names of Vishnu avatara including the name Sugato (Which Shankara calls Buddha) and seven names of Shakya Simha Buddha without any mention of Sugato. So we can even argue that Shankara talks about avatar Buddha not Shakya Buddha. Amarakosha states the Lord Buddha is also known as Samanta Bhadra, whereas Gautama Buddha is a human being.

Analysing Buddhist texts like Prajna-Paramita sutra, Astasahastrika prajna- paramita sutra, Sata-Shastrika Prajna, Pramita Sutra, Lalita Vistara shows three categories of Buddha namely,

Human Buddhas: Like Gautama, who came to be known as Buddha after enlightment.
Bodhisattva Buddhas: Personalities like Samanta Bhadraka who were born enlightened.
Adi(Original-First) Buddha: the Avatar of Vishnu.

Adi Shankara, who can be termed founder of Hinduism,in discussion with others treated both Buddhas as one person and did not discriminate between the two.Hindu scholars doesn't see Vedanta in Buddhism,since Buddha was a Nasthika.Maybe,Buddhism can be included only as part of the Purva Mimamsa,which dwelt only in outer spheres of human actions.With his Advaita Mayavadha philosophy Sankara not only stopped the rise of Buddhism in India, assuring its decline. 

By Combining two Buddhas Indology scholars have ignored the Purana accounts and thus the Indian mythology. Whenever the Puranas refers to Adi Buddha,the euro centric scholars will cite Gautama Buddha to discredit and vice versa.

Colonel Kennedy, argues that the Buddha of the Purana and Buddha the founder of the Buddhist system of religion have nothing in common but the name, and that the attempted identification of these two is simply the work of European scholars, who have not been sufficiently careful to collect information, and to weigh the evidence they have had before them.

The Cambridge and Oxford histories of India accept 483 B.C as the date of Buddha’s nirvana. But, William Jones, on the basis of Chinese and Tibetan records infers that Buddha lived in the 11th century B.C. Historian Fleet, who makes a study of ‘Rajatarangini’, thinks that Buddha lived in the 17th century B.C. Chinese monk Fa-Hien puts Buddha’s Nirvana at 1050 B.C. These contradictory theories arise from the euro centric existential dilemma.

Indology scholars just pick and choose to discredit Purana sources. The history that Buddha lived in the 5th century B.C was propounded by E.J Rapson who writes that the exact date of Buddha’s Nirvana is not known and hence the popularly accepted year of Buddha’s Nirvana is imaginary. Western scholars arbitrarily skipped 12 centuries of Indian history because their ‘hypothesis’ about Alexander’s invasion did not match with centuries-old Indian chronology.

We see that Early Buddhist texts distinguishes the two Buddhas, while the later ones seem to ignore the former. The Rock Edicts of Piyadasi teachings are of Adi Buddha and not Gautama Buddha. Gautama Buddha is not the avatar of Vishnu. Avatar of Vishnu is Adi Buddha.

Buddha is considered as an avatar of Vishnu, by traditions within Hinduism. Buddhists traditionally do not accept the Buddha to be a Vishnu avatar. The adoption of Buddha may have been a way to assimilate Buddhism into the fold of Hinduism.Much like Hinduism's adoption of the Buddha as an avatar, Buddhism legends too adopted Krishna in their Jataka tales, claiming Krishna the Vishnu avatar, to be a character whom Buddha met and taught in his previous births. The adoption of the Buddha in texts relating to Hindu gods, and of Hindu gods in Buddhist texts, is difficult to place chronologically. According to Alf Hiltebeitel and other scholars, some of the stories in Buddha-related Jataka tales found in Pali texts seem slanderous distortions of Hindu legends, but these may reflect the ancient local traditions and the complexities of early interaction between the two Indian religions.

Bodh Gaya

Though an avatar of Vishnu, the Buddha is rarely worshipped like Krishna and Rama in Hinduism.According to John Holt, the Buddha was adopted as an avatar of Vishnu around the time the Puranas were being composed, in order to subordinate him into the Brahmanical ideology. Further adds Holt, various scholars in India, Sri Lanka and outside South Asia, that the colonial era and contemporary attempts to assimilate Buddha into the Hindu fold are part of a nationalistic political agenda, where the Buddha has been reclaimed triumphantly as a symbol of indigenous nationalist understandings of India's history and culture.

Swami Vivekananda said:

"Buddha was a great Vedantist (for Buddhism was really only an offshoot of Vedanta), and Shankara is often called a “hidden Buddhist”. Buddha made the analysis, Shankara made the synthesis out of it. Buddha never bowed down to anything — neither Veda, nor caste, nor priest, nor custom. He fearlessly reasoned so far as reason could take him. Such a fearless search for truth and such love for every living thing the world has never seen."

He added:

"In Buddha we had the great, universal heart and infinite patience, making religion practical and bringing it to everyone’s door. In Sankaracharya we saw tremendous intellectual power, throwing the scorching light of reason upon everything. We want today that bright sun of intellectuality joined with the heart of Buddha, the wonderful infinite heart of love and mercy. This union will give us the highest philosophy. Science and religion will meet and shake hands. Poetry and philosophy will become friends.."

There are several other statements of Vivekananda on Buddha,which are contradictory;he has also termed Buddha a Hindu.In Notes Taken Down in Madras ( 1892-1893) ,Vivekananda says,"Buddha,we may say now,ought to have understood the harmony of  religions;he introduced sectarianism."

But in Vivekananda's Buddha's Message to The World ( 18 March 1900 ) Vivekananda remarked:

"Buddha was the triumph in the struggle that had been going on between the priests and the prophets in India. One thing can be said for these Indian priests — they were not and never are intolerant of religion; they never have persecuted religion. Any man was allowed to preach against them. Theirs is such a religion; they never molested any one for his religious views. But they suffered from the peculiar weaknesses of all the priests: they also sought power, they also promulgated rules and regulations and made religion unnecessarily complicated, and thereby undermined the strength of those who followed their religion."

Vedantists will never agree with Vivekananda's statement that Buddha was a vedantist.Buddhism,infact,has nothing to do with vedanta.For this too,I quote Vivekananda:"Buddhism proves nothing about the Absolute Entity. In a stream the water is changing; we have no right to call the stream one. Buddhist deny the one, and say, it is many. We say it is one and deny the many. What they call Karma is what we call the soul. According to Buddhism, man is a series of waves. Every wave dies, but somehow the first wave causes the second. That the second wave is identical with the first is illusion. To get rid of illusion good Karma is necessary. Buddhists do not postulate anything beyond the world. We say, beyond the relative there is the Absolute".

The Oxford professor and later President of India, S Radhakrishnan states that "as a matter of fact, nowhere did Buddha repudiate the Upanishad conception of Brahman, the absolute"; that Buddha, if anything, "accepted the Upanishad's position". Buddhologists like K.R. Norman and Richard Gombrich meanwhile, argue that the Buddha's anatta theory does indeed extend to the Brahmanical belief expounded in the Brihadaranyaka Upanishad that the Self (Atman) is the Universal Self, or Brahman.They point to the Pali Alagaddūpama-sutta, where the Buddha argues that an individual cannot experience the suffering of the entire world.

Ambedkar,the Dalit leader who in 1935 declared his intention to convert from Hinduism to Buddhism and converted about 20 years later, rejected that Buddha was an incarnation of Vishnu. Ambedkar, while he was a Hindu and before he launched a new form of Buddhism, reinterpreted Buddha's teachings into what he called Navayana (New Vehicle), wherein he tried a Marxist interpretation of Buddha teachings. He founded and converted to a new version of Buddhism, a version which criticized and rejected Hinduism, but also Theravada Buddhism and Mahayana Buddhism because, according to Ambedkar, they all misrepresented the Buddha.

To me,arguing on philosphy is intellectual masturbation.Buddha need not be a Hindu to be accepted into its fold because Buddha is part of the great Indian tradition where the Samkhya/Charvaka primeval Marxist philosphy ruled for 700 years.Hinduism even accepts that soulless philosphy part of its tradition.Hence,the ousted Rama advised his brother King Bharatha to  honour the Charvakas,the then Marxists,while knowing the Marxists are intolerant.Hence the many lives of Buddha makes the Indian tradition vibrant and exotic.

© Ramachandran