Wednesday, 17 February 2021

ഗാന്ധി കാണാത്ത മാപ്പിള ലഹള ഇറങ്ങി

 ഗാന്ധി കാണാത്ത മാപ്പിള ലഹള


സർ സി ശങ്കരൻ നായർ എഴുതിയ 'ഗാന്ധിയും അരാജകത്വവും' ( Gandhi and Anarchy ) എന്ന പുസ്തകത്തിൽ മാപ്പിള ലഹളയെയും ഖിലാഫത്തിനെയും പരാമർശിക്കുന്ന ഭാഗങ്ങളുടെ പരിഭാഷ..
പരിഭാഷ:രാമചന്ദ്രൻ
പേജ് 88,വില 100 രൂപ
കുരുക്ഷേത്ര പ്രകാശൻ,കലൂർ കൊച്ചി 0484 233 8324




Sunday, 31 January 2021

TIPU SULTAN DEFEATED AT ALUVA

Jihad and Genocide in Malabar

Ramachandran

14. Astrologers Played with his Mind

The defeat at Nedumkotta in Travancore made the superstitious Tipu Sultan consult more astrologers and diviners, since a danger to his life soon, had been predicted. He was defeated by the Travancore forces when he broke the Nedumkotta lines and reached the mouth of the Periyar River at Aluva (Alwaye).

The Marxist and Islamic historians have tried to paint Tipu as a secular Sultan by dropping the names of certain Hindu officials of Tipu. It was difficult for him to get learned Muslims for such jobs; Tipu also began appeasing Hindus, after his debacle at Nedumkotta. Thus the Mysore temples and the Sringeri Mutt got grants and lands. Brahmin astrologers had told him that he would be a Badusha if he won the battle with the British. His high officials like Poornaiah and Madanna got those seats not because of secularism, but out of Tipu's superstition.

Lewis Rice who wrote History of Mysore after going through various official records satiated thus:

" In the vast empire of Tipu Sultan, on the eve of his death, there were only two Hindu temples having daily pujas within the Srirangapatanam fortress. It is only for the satisfaction of Brahmin astrologers who used to study his horoscope that Tipu Sultan had spared those two temples. The entire wealth of every Hindu temple was confiscated before 1790 itself mainly to make up for the revenue loss due to total prohibition in the country."

If Karthika Thirunal Ramavarma, popularly known as Dharmaraja (1724-1798) of Travancore was not there, the Hindus of Malabar would have faced a total genocide; Malabar would have been an Islamic country. Dharmaraja gave asylum and protected the Hindus who had fled Malabar during the invasion of Hyder Ali and Tipu Sultan.

Since Tipu's defeat has been subdued in the pseudo-secular historical sphere, it has to be retold. When Tipu's invasion was looming large on the horizon, Dharmaraja removed the Paravur, and Alangad princes and bought their principalities. He bought Kodungallur and Pallipuram forts from the Zamorin. He sent the powerful Dewan Ayyappan Marthandan Pillai and the armed forces Commander Eustachius De Lannoy to Cochin and built the 48-kilometre-long Nedumkotta, from Kodungallur to Anamala, to block Tipu from entering Travancore. Tipu was defeated at Alwaye, without any help from the nearby Kochi king.

Srirangapatanam Fort

Kochi had become a vassal of Tipu, by paying an annual tribute. Dharmaraja got a lover from the Zamorin family, which had fled Malabar: the Sanskrit scholar Manorama Thampuratty, who had been a guru to even Nambudiri males.

Dharmaraja had ascended the throne after the death of his uncle Marthanda Varma, in 1758. He had a Malabar connection and was the son of the princess of Kolathunadu, who was adopted to Attingal in 1718. While he became the king, the threat of the Ettuveettil nobles and Kayamkulam king was at its peak. When Dharmaraja was just four years old, his father, Kilimanur Keralavarma had been killed in an attempt by the Kayamkulam king. Dharmaraja had to flee from Haripad to Budhanur Brahmin ruler, Vanjipuzha Adhikari.

Travancore's story as a powerful Hindu kingdom began with Marthanda Varma, who inherited the kingdom of Venad (Thrippappur) and extended it to Travancore during his reign (1729–58). After defeating a union of feudal lords and establishing internal peace, he expanded the kingdom of Venad through a series of military campaigns from Kanyakumari in the south to the borders of Kochi in the north during his 29-year reign. This led to the Travancore-Dutch War (1739-1753) between the Dutch East India Company which had become an ally of some of these kingdoms and Travancore.

In 1741 Travancore won the Battle of Colachel against the Dutch East India Company, which resulted in a complete eclipse of Dutch power in the region. In this battle, the admiral of the Dutch, Eustachius De Lannoy, was captured and the Dutch dismissed him to Travancore. De Lannoy was named Captain of Travancore Raja's bodyguard and later Senior Admiral ("Valiya Captain") and he modernized the Travancore Army by introducing firearms and artillery. Travancore became the most dominant state in Kerala by defeating the mighty Zamorin in the Battle of Purakkad in 1755. Ramayyan Dalawa, the Prime Minister (1737–1756) of Marthanda Varma, played an important role in the consolidation and expansion.

At the battle of Ambalapuzha, Marthanda Varma defeated the union of the kings deposed and the king of Cochin.

Consolidation

After Marthanda Varma consolidated his position, neighbouring countries tried for a treaty. From 1755 onwards, a part of Kochi was with Marthanda Varma. Though Varma signed a treaty with Kochi in 1756, he refrained from helping Kochi, which was under Dutch Suzerainty. The barons of Kochi were under Zamorin's henchmen. The Dutch ditched Kochi when the Zamorin promised to cede Chettuva, which he had seized from the Dutch earlier.

The Kochi king met Dharmaraja and begged him to have an alliance, with Hindus. A treaty was signed between them, in 1761, at the Sthanu Murthy Temple at Sucheendram, in the presence of Hindu religious leaders. Then, Dharmaraja gave orders to Ayyappan Marthandan Pillai and de Lanoy to rescue Kochi from the clutches of Zamorin.

When Pillai's army reached Paravur, the Paravur ruler fled first to Kodungallur and then to Mapranam, near Irinjalakuda.The Kochi army consisted of Nairs from Kavalappara and Perattuvithi. The Zamorin force was routed at Mapranam and they retreated to Trichur. From there, they went back to Kunnamkulam, and Chelakkara camps.

De Lannoy confronted the Zamorin forces at Kodungallur. It fled to Trichur via Chettuva and Enamakkal Lannoy joined with Pillai's force and they together reached Chelakkara. They defeated the Zamorin force, which then crossed the northern border and fled. When the Travancore force reached Kunnamkulam, the Zamorin army there, retreated to Ponnani.The Zamorin yielded to the pressure for a treaty when De Lannoy decided to march to Calicut. The Zamorin went all the way to Padmanabhapuram to sign the treaty; it was decided that Zamorin pay Rs 1.5 Lakh as war expenses. Paravur and Alangad rulers were retired and the principalities were amalgamated into Travancore.

Then began the building of Nedumkotta or the Big Fort.

The idea to build the fort was one Marthanda Varma nurtured. Varma had deliberately left Kochi without conquering, it as a buffer zone, between Travancore and Malabar, according to Dutch documents.

The Dutch began to spy for Travancore when they were defeated at the Colachal battle. They didn't allow a safe passage for Hyder Ali to Travancore when it was asked for. Hyder demanded war expenses from Kochi and Travancore, alleging that giving asylum to his enemies was an act of war. He died without fulfilling his wish to conquer both Kochi and Travancore.

Hyder had sent epistles to Cochin and Travancore through the Dutch Commissioners and demanded acknowledgement of his suzerainty. The Dutch were successful in concluding an accord with Hyder not to molest Cochin on the condition of paying two lakhs of rupees and eight elephants. The Raja of Cochin accepted the suzerainty of Hyder. But Travancore Raja objected on the ground that he was already a tributary to Arcot Nawab Muhammad Ali and he could not afford to subsidize two suzerains at a time. At the same time, Travancore feared an attack from Hyder. This was reported by the Raja of Travancore to the Governor of Bombay, Charles Crommelin. He gave expression to the fear "Hyder Ali may attack my kingdom also and my reliance is entirely on the ancient friendship with the Company, to them I will transfer 3000 candies of pepper […] on condition that the English Company will supply me with money and warlike stores and that the Company will defend my kingdom at my expense". (1)

Since Travancore resisted his conditions, Hyder wanted to invade that territory. However, the monsoon that had set in by that time on the Malabar Coast averted his plan to attack Travancore.

March to Malabar

Revolts began in 1788 in Tipu's vassal states. Tipu marched to Malabar and Coorg to confront it. Hindus were forcibly taken en masse to Srirangapatnam and converted to Islam. Hindus including the Zamorin family and Christians fled Malabar.Tipu asked Kochi to claim Paravur and Alangad.Kochi king delayed by saying he would try to persuade the Travancore king to become a vassal of Tipu. Tipu sent his messengers to Travancore, with a Khareeda. Travancore King received them in the presence of the East India Company. Tipu saw the presence of the British as an insult; he led his army in 1789 to Kochi, alleging, that the building of the Nedumkotta in his vassal state was illegal. He could not cross into Travancore.

The strength of the Travancore Nair Army was greatly reduced after several earlier battles with Hyder Ali's forces. The death of the Dutch-born commander De Lannoy in 1777 further diminished the morale of the soldiers. The death of Makayiram Thirunal and Aswati Thirunal in 1786 forced the Travancore royal family to adopt two princesses from Kolathunad. As the threat of an invasion by Tipu Sultan loomed large, Dharma Raja tried to rebuild his army by appointing Raman Pillai as the Dalawa (Dewan) and Kesava Pillai as the Sarvadhikaryakkar.

Tipu had planned the invasion of Travancore for many years, and he was especially concerned with the Nedumkotta fortifications, which had prevented his father Hyder Ali from annexing the kingdom.

But the situation changed very much in favour of Rama Varma Dharmaraja when he was included by the British ‘as a friend and ally’ of the Company in the Treaty of Mangalore, after the Second Anglo-Mysore War. As a shrewd politician, Tipu quickly adjusted himself to the altered situation. Instead of an aggressive policy of ‘demanding vassalage’ from Travancore, as Hyder Ali did, Tipu’s policy was to appease the Travancore Raja and win him over by settling peacefully the outstanding disputes with him. Quoting Tipu’s letter to Rama Varma, Islamic historian C K Kareem comments: "The request here was for alliance and not for vassalage, clearly unfolds the shift of Mysorean policy".On the other hand, Rama Varma who was confident of ‘English support’ not only ignored the friendly overtures of Tipu but also continued his hostile activities breaking there by the provisions of the Treaty of Mangalore, to which he was also one of the signatories.

Dispute over Nedumkotta

A dispute arose between Tipu and Travancore Raja with respect to the strengthening of defensive lines by Travancore at Travancore – Cochin boundary by the Nedumkotta. Rama Varma extended the Travancore Lines through the territory of Raja of Cochin up to the Fort of Cranganore, thus cutting the small Kingdom of Cochin into two unequal divisions. Tipu demanded the demolition of these lines as they sheltered the hostile elements from Mysore and moreover, Cochin was his vassal state. The Raja refused to demolish them and it became a serious point of dispute. Tipu asserted his right to remove them as these lines stood in the territory of his tributary, the Raja of Cochin; and the Travancore Raja felt justified in not removing them as they had existed long before Cochin had passed under Tipu’s suzerainty. Tipu was already furious by the asylum provided by Travancore Raja to the fugitive chieftains of Malabar and his secret aids in encouraging the rebellious elements in Malabar. Apart from the question of lines, the purchasing of the two Dutch forts, Cranganore and Ayikotta, by the Raja added fuel to the fire. Ayikotta was a military post on the northern extremity of the narrow island of Vypin on the Malabar Coast and Cranganore about two miles from Ayikotta. Travancore Raja's purchase of these two places became the ultimate cause of the Third Anglo-Mysore War.

Towards the end of 1789, Tipu Sultan marched his troops from Coimbatore. Tipu's army consisted of 20,000 infantry, 10,000 spearmen and match-lockmen, 5,000 cavalry and 20 field guns.

Travancore purchased the strategic forts of Cranganore and Ayacottah from the Dutch to improve the country's defences. The deal was finalized by Dewan Kesava Pillai and three Jewish merchants under the instruction of Dharma Raja and Dutch East India Company Governor John Gerard van Anglebeck. Travancore also held a treaty with the British East India Company, under whose terms two battalions of the Company army were stationed at the Travancore-Cochin frontier. Both Tipu Sultan and Governor John Holland of Madras objected to these purchases because the forts, though they had long been in Dutch possession, were in the Kingdom of Cochin, which was a tributary state of Mysore.

Both Cranganore and Ayikottah were strategic places coveted by both the Raja and Tipu. It was Tipu who initiated the negotiation with the Dutch for the sale of these places and when they were about to close the deal, the Travancore Raja intervened. The British Madras Government also did not encourage the Raja to purchase them, as it would lead to unnecessary complications. Despite the warning, the Raja proceeded to acquire these places without consulting the Company any further in the matter. On 31 July 1789, the sale was effected, but the English were unaware of these transactions until August 17 when George Powney, the Resident at Travancore, wrote to Holland, the Governor of Madras. The forts were sold for three lakh Surat silver rupees. The Jewish merchants David Rahaboy, Euphram Cohen and Anta Setty acted as sureties of the debt. The Dutch preferred the Travancore Raja to Tipu for the sale, because the Dutch relations with Tipu were not happy. The Jewish merchants in the area, who were highly influential, felt that their trade would be in danger if Tipu were to acquire these places.

The Raja, the Dutch and the Jewish merchants all found themselves in dread of Tipu. The Raja of Cochin indirectly supported this deal, though he pretended to be on Tipu’s side. C K Kareem guesses: "The Cochin Raja wanted to be free from the vassalage at the earliest opportunity as any other ruler would desire. Therefore, his relation was always shady and full of intrigue."

But in the Cochin State Manual, C Achutha Menon sets down the reason for Cochin Raja's antagonism towards Tipu: "With all this, his subjection to a Mohammedan usurper of Mysore was felt as an irksome burden by Cochin".

In his correspondence with the governor–general and Governor of Madras, the Travancore Raja openly admitted that he had his negotiations with the English and had purchased these forts from the Dutch with the knowledge of the Company. George Powney, the Resident of Travancore, was censured by Lord Cornwallis for his unjustifiable conduct in conniving with the Raja in these transactions. (2).

Nedumkotta Battle

Although Tipu was enraged by the sale, he waited for five months, hoping that the English might solve the dispute amicably. The Madras Government was anxious not to offer Tipu any excuse for war, but Cornwallis gradually changed his policy. When nothing happened for five months, Tipu marched towards the Travancore lines hoping that at least his presence would make the Raja change his mind. Travancore Raja remained firm and the first clash of arms took place on 29 December 1789. Tipu invited Powney, but the change of Governor at Madras had altered the entire situation. Tipu attacked the Travancore lines. The war was on, and according to oral history, the Cochin Raja fled to Cherthala and stayed at the Anjili palace, inside the Velorvattam temple compound.

Kesava Pillai (Raja Kesavadas) was appointed as the Commander-in-Chief of the Travancore Army. To boost the strength of the armed forces, several thousand young militiamen were called up from all over the kingdom. The forts of Cranganore and Ayikotta were repaired and garrisoned. Tipu sent a letter to the King of Travancore demanding the withdrawal of the Travancore forces garrisoned in Cranganore Fort, the transfer to him of Malabar lords who have been sheltered by the king, and the demolition of Travancore ramparts built within the territory of Cochin. The king refused Tipu's demands.

Sriranganathaswamy Temple

Twenty-four years after his father Hyder Ali had attacked Kochi, Tipu began a march to conquer Kochi and Travancore. The Mysore army entered the Cochin kingdom from Coimbatore in November 1789 and reached Trichur in December. On 28 December 1789, Tipu attacked Nedumkotta (northern lines) from the north, causing the Battle of Nedumkotta. The Mysore army under Tipu was repulsed. Tipu's army consisted of 20,000 infantry, 10,000 spearmen and match-lockmen, 5,000 cavalry and 20 field guns.

A number of Mysorean soldiers encroached into Travancore jungles, ostensibly to apprehend fugitives, and came under fire when discovered by Travancore patrols. (3). On 28 December 1789, Mysorean troops attacked the eastern part of the Travancore lines and captured the ramparts as the Travancoreans retreated, but were eventually stopped when the Travancore force of 800 Nair soldiers made a stand with six-pounder guns (4). Travancore reinforcements arrived during the four-hour battle, and they inflicted heavy casualties on the Mysoreans, who lost 1000-1500 soldiers and fled in panic (5). Several Mysorean troops were captured as prisoners of war, including soldiers of European and Maratha origin (6). Travancore forces recovered the sword, the palanquin, the dagger, the ring and many other personal effects of Tipu Sultan from the ditches of the Nedumkotta and presented them to the ruler of Travancore. Some of them were sent to the Nawab of Carnatic at his request.

After Nedumkotta Battle

According to Mohibul Hasan, approximately two months after this incident, on 1 March 1790, 1,000 Travancore troops advanced onto Mysore territory, where they were stopped and pushed back with considerable losses by Mysorean troops. On 9 April 1790, a similar attempt was made once again by 3,000 Travancore troops on Mysore territory, however, they were once again stopped by Mysorean troops and repulsed.

In the march towards Travancore after the Nedumkotta Battle, it is said that Tipu's 400 horsemen drowned in Periyar. His commander Kamaruddin Khan requested Tipu to climb down from the palanquin. Khan fell down, held Tipu's legs, and begged for a retreat. The loyal soldiers held Tipu on their shoulders and swam to safety. The palanquin, bed and sword became the victory trophies to Travancore. It is said that Tipu limped to his last after a fall in a ditch at the mouth of the Periyar.

On 12 April 1790, Tipu decided to attack the Travancore lines and within approximately three days was able to breach three-quarters of a mile of the lines: On 15 April 1790 he took approximately 6,000 soldiers and advanced on the Travancore position. The Travancore troops were taken by surprise and fled. On 18 April 1790, Tipu arrived within one mile of Cranganore and erected batteries. On 8 May 1790, Tipu successfully occupied Cranganore. Soon other forts such as Ayikotta and Parur surrendered without fighting. Tipu destroyed the Travancore lines and reached all the way to Varapuzha (Verapoly).

He destroyed the wall at Konoor Kotta or Kottamuri and advanced further. He filled trenches for a few kilometres to enable his army to move forward. He destroyed many temples but he didn’t touch the mosques. He finally reached the Periyar river banks at Aluva and camped there. The Travancore forces regrouped, but the onset of monsoons prevented Tipu from moving south.

According to Logan, Tipu's army crossed the Periyar River from Kodungallur to Varapuzha, where it was confronted by the Travancore army under Raja Kesavadas. Tipu lost 4,000 men and his commander Ali Baig was hacked to death. Tipu's army retreated to Chettuva, and he got reinforcements from Mysore and Coimbatore. The Mysore army again crossed the river. At this crucial hour, a French emissary met Tipu and informed him that an English naval contingent under Head Lingley was on its way from Mumbai, to support the Travancore Army. Tipu assessed that the Navy would confront him from the north at Kondungallur. The Travancore guns were waiting in the South. It was the Arabian Sea in the West, and the Periyar River in the East, and The Periyar was flooded in the untimely rain showers. Tipu escaped to the Northern bank and he was informed that an army under General Medows was on its way from Trichy, to capture Srirangapatna. He left the Ttravancore theatre of war.

The folklore says a small group led by Ayyappan Marthandan Pillai and Kali Kutty went upstream and managed to break the walls of a natural dam at Bhoothathankettu causing heavy flash floods downstream of Periyar River. All the ammunition and gunpowder of Tipu's army got wet and became inactive. He was thus forced to return. Information that the British army was planning an attack on Srirangapatnam hastened Tipu's retreat. Kalikutty became a character called Kunchaikutty Pillai, in C V Raman Pillai's novel, Ramaraja Bahadur. Kalikutty got the honorific Pillai after this adventure. The character is roughly based on Vaikam Padmanabha Pillai.

The defeated Tipu, writes P K Balakrishnan, while retreating, saw a nutmeg plant at Chalakkudy, which he took to Srirangapatanam. He had planted Fir trees in the capital. (7).

The Kochi royal family fled to Vaikam when Tipu reached Alwaye.

Travancore Dewan T Madhava Rao later assessed that it was the Nedumkotta that blocked Tipu's entry. Tipu could unleash destruction, arson and looting only at Angamaly, Alwaye, Varapuzha and Alangad.

Mysore actions against Travancore brought it into further conflict with the British Empire and led to the Third Anglo-Mysore War. Tipu told the Madras Governor Edward Holland that he got defeated at Nedumkotta because his army concentrated on finding the people of Malabar who had sought asylum in Travancore and Kochi. Thus, Tipu himself admitted that he lost a Jihad.
Ruins of Nedumkotta

Tipu was in the habit of writing several letters a day and those letters prove that he was a fanatic.

Tipu wrote to Abdul Khadir on 22 March 1788:

“Over 12,000 Hindus were honoured with Islam. There were many Namboodri Brahmins among them. This achievement should be widely publicised among the Hindus. Then the local Hindus should be brought before you and converted to Islam. No Namboodri Brahmin should be spared.”

Tipu wrote to his army Commander at Calicut Hussain Ali Khan, on 14 December 1788:

“I am sending two of my followers with Mir Hussain Ali. With their assistance, you should capture and kill all Hindus. Those below 20 may be kept in prison and 5,000 from the rest should be killed from the tree-tops. These are my orders.”

This instruction could not be adhered to by the Mappilas fully, because the British intervened to stop the genocide.

He wrote to Budroos Usman Khan on 13 February 1790:

"Your two letters, with the enclosed memorandums of the Naimar (or Nair) captives, have been received. You did right in ordering a hundred and thirty-five of them to be circumcised, and in putting eleven of the youngest of these into the Usud Ilhye band (or class) and the remaining ninety-four into the Ahmedy Troop, consigning the whole, at the same time, to the charge of the Kilaaddar of Nugr…" (8).

Tipu wrote to the Afghan King Saman Sha:

"we should come together in carrying on a holy war against the infidels, and for freeing the region of Hindustan from the contamination of the enemies of our religion (Hindus)".

Tipu wrote to Sayyid Abdul Dhula on 18 January 1790:

"With the grace of Prophet Mohammed and Allah, almost all Hindus in Calicut are converted to Islam. Only on the borders of Cochin State a few are still not converted. I am determined to convert them very soon. I consider this as Jehad to achieve that object" (9)

Tipu wrote to Bekal Governor Budroos Usman Khan, on 19 January 1790:

"Don't you know I have achieved a great victory recently in Malabar and over four lakh Hindus were converted to Islam? I am determined to march against that cursed 'Raman Nair' very soon (reference is to Rama Varma Raja of Travancore State who was popularly known as Dharma Raja). Since I am overjoyed at the prospect of converting him and his subjects to Islam, I have happily abandoned the idea of going back to Srirangapatanam now" (10).

The Raman Nair mentioned here is Dharmaraja.

After the third Anglo-Mysore war, Major Alex Dirom found Tipu's seal:

"I am the Messenger of the true faith."
"I bring Unto you the Edicts of Truth."
"From CONQUEST and the Protection of the Royal Hyder comes my tide of SULTAN and the world under the Sun and Moon is subject to my Signet."

Portuguese traveller Fr Paulino Bartholomew wrote in his travelogue, Voyage to East Indies (1772 ) :

First, a corps of 30,000 barbarians who butchered everybody on the way… followed by the field-gun unit under the French Commander, M. Lally… Tipu was riding on an elephant behind which another army of 30,000 soldiers followed. Most of the men and women were hanged in Calicut, first mothers were hanged with their children tied to necks of mothers. That barbarian Tipu Sultan tied the naked Christians and Hindus to the legs of elephants and made the elephants move around till the bodies of the helpless victims were torn to pieces. Temples and churches were ordered to be burned down, desecrated and destroyed. Christian and Hindu women were forced to marry Mohammadans and similarly, their men were forced to marry Mohammadan women. Those Christians who refused to be honoured with Islam were ordered to be killed by hanging immediately. These atrocities were told to me by the victims of Tipu Sultan who escaped from the clutches of his army and reached Varappuzha, which is the centre of Carmichael Christian Mission. I myself helped many victims to cross the Varappuzha River by boat.

The report of Major Fullarton, who fought Tipu at Mangalore states:

(During the siege 1783) Tipu”s soldiers daily exposed the heads of many innocent Brahmins within sight of the fort for Zamorin and his Hindu followers to see. It is asserted that the Zamorin rather than witness such enormities and to avoid further killing of innocent Brahmins, chose to abandon the Palghat Fort... It was not only against the Brahmins who were thus put in a state of terror of forcible circumcision and conversion; but against all sections of Hindus. In August 1788, a Raja of the Kshatriya family of Parappanad and also Trichera Thiruppad, a chieftain of Nilamboor, and many other Hindu nobles who had been carried away earlier to Coimbatore by Tipu Sultan, were forcibly circumcised and forced to cat beef.

Lewis B. Boury quoted in P.C.N. Raja: (11)

To show his ardent devotion and steadfast faith in the Muhammaddan religion, Tipu Sultan found Kozhikode to be the most suitable place. It was because the Hindus of Malabar 'refused to reject the matriarchal system, polyandry and half nakedness of women' that the 'great reformer' Tipu Sultan tried to honour the entire population with Islam.

Tipu's proclamation against Nairs in 1788:

"From the period of the conquest until this day, during twenty-four years, you have been a turbulent and refractory people, and in the wars waged during your rainy season, you have caused a number of our warriors to taste the drought of martyrdom. Be it so. What is past is past. Hereafter you must proceed in an opposite manner, dwell quietly and pay your dues like good subjects and since it is the practice with you for one woman to associate with ten men, and you leave your mothers and sisters unconstrained in their obscene practices, and are thence all born in adultery, and are more shameless in your connections than the beasts of the fields: I hereby require you to forsake these sinful practices and be like the rest of mankind; and if you are disobedient to these commands, I have made repeated vows to honour the whole of you with Islam and to march all the chief persons to the seat of Government."

P A Syed Muhammad, the historian wrote that Tipu's invasion was similar to that of Genghis Khan and Timur ( Muslim Charithram).

The prominent royal families, who have migrated from Malabar and settled in Travancore are 16:

Neerazhi Kovilakam(Changanacherry), Lakshmipuram Palace (Changanacherry ), Ennakkad Gramathil Kovilakam (from where Communist leader George Chadayammuri found his life partner), Paliyakkara(Tiruvalla), Nedumparampu, Chempara Madom, Ananthapuram Kottaram (Haripad), Ezhumattur Palace, Aranmula Kottaram, Varanad Kovilakam, Mavelikara, Murikoyikkal Palace, Mariapilly(Kottayam), Koratti Swarupam, Kaipuzha Kovilakam, Kottapuram.

Prominent Historian Ilamkulam Kunjan Pillai has recorded that with the forcible conversion of Hindus by Tipu, there was a steep hike in the Muslim population in Malabar. According to Vadakkumkoor Rajaraja Varma, Tipu enjoyed in destroying temples and adorning the idols with the heads and entrails of cows. He spared the two temples inside the Srirangapatanam fort because he believed in astrological predictions.

The list of temples attacked by Tipu:

Thaliparanm, Thrichambram, Thali,
Sree Valliyanat Kavu,Thiruvannur,Varaykkal,Puthur,Govindapuram,
Thalikunnu,Thirunnavaya,Thiruvangat,Vadakara,Ponmeri,
Chalakudi,Mannumpuram,Kalpathi,Hemambika,Kachamkurissi,Palakkad Jainatemple,Keraladeeswaram,Thrikandiyur,Thriprangat,
Kodikunnu,Thrithala,Panniyur,Sukapuram,Edappatt Perumparamp,
Maranelira temples of Azhvancheri,Vengeri,Thrikulam,Ramanattukara,
Azhinjilla,Indianur,Mannur,Venkidangu,Parambathli,Panmayanad.

Maniyur Masjid was a temple; Ponnani Thrikkav temple became Tipu's arsenal. The Jaina temple at present Sulthan Bathery became Tipu's gun godown, and hence it acquired the place name, Sultan's Battery. Its original name was Ganapathivattam.

In 1789 Tipu sent Gulam Ali, Gaji Khan and Darvedil Khan with troops into Coorg by way of Siddhesvara. where they took up strong positions and seized grain, men, women and children while burning houses that they pillaged. They set fire to the Padinalkanadu temple. Later the 'Malayalam' (Malabar region) people joined the Coorgs. Tipu sent Gulam Ali into Malabar but en route, Gulam was attacked by the Coorgs. Gulam managed to reach Malabar where he burnt down the Payyavur temple and attacked that region.

That same year (1789), when Tipu was marching against the Nairs at Calicut who had become rebellious, he heard of another rebellion in Coorg. He sent a force towards Coorg under Burhan ud Din and Sayed Hamid. Tipu himself crossed the Tamarasseri(Tamrachadi) Ghat and entered the Malabar region. There he ordered some of the inhabitants to be converted (made Asadulai), placed Officer Ghafar in command there and had a wooden fort or stockade built.
__________________________________________

1. Quoted in C K Kareem/Kerala Under Haider Ali and Tipu Sultan
2. N. A. D., Fgn. Pol. Sec. Proc., Dec. 15, 1789; p. 2882, Cornwallis to Powney
3. Mia Carter, Barbara Harlow (31 December 2003) /Archives of Empire: Volume I. From The East India Company to the Suez Canal p. 174
4. Mohibbul Hasan (2005) History of Tipu Sultan 
5. John Clark Marshman (1863) / The History of India, p. 450 
6.Veeraraghavapuram, Nagam Aiya (1906) /  Travancore State Manual
7. P K Balakrishnan / Tipu Sultan
8.W. Kirkpatrick /Select Letters of Tipoo Sultan /  London 1811
9. K.M. Panicker /Bhasha Poshini, August, 1923
10. K M Panicker    
11. Raja PCN /Religious Intolerance of Tipu Sultan 


© Ramachandran

Monday, 18 January 2021

വിശുദ്ധന് മേൽ തേലക്കാട്ട് കണ്ട കരിനിഴൽ 

വിശുദ്ധനും സ്വവർഗാനുരാഗിയും 

ജോണ്‍ പോള്‍ രണ്ടാമന്‍ മാര്‍പ്പാപ്പയുടെ വിശുദ്ധ പദവി സംബന്ധിച്ച് വിവാദ ലേഖനമെഴുതിയതിന് ഫാദര്‍ പോള്‍ തേലക്കാട്ടിനെതിരെ അച്ചടക്ക നടപടിക്ക് സീറോ മലബാര്‍ സഭ ശുപാർശ ചെയ്തതായി റിപ്പോർട്ടുകൾ കാണുന്നു. 

വാർത്തയിൽ ഇങ്ങനെ കാണുന്നു:"ജോൺ പോൾ രണ്ടാമൻ മാർപാപ്പയെ വിശുദ്ധനായി പ്രഖ്യാപിച്ചത് തെറ്റായിപ്പോയിയെന്നായിരുന്നു സീറോ മലബാർ സഭ മുൻ വക്താവ് ഫാ. പോൾ തേലക്കാട്ട് 'സത്യദീപ'ത്തിൽ എഴുതിയ ലേഖനം. മരിച്ച് അഞ്ചു വർഷങ്ങൾ കഴിയാതെ നാമകരണ നടപടികൾ തുടങ്ങരുത് എന്ന നിയമം പോലും മറികടന്നാണ് ജോൺ പോൾ രണ്ടാമൻ മാർപ്പാപ്പയെ വിശുദ്ധനായി പ്രഖ്യാപിച്ചതെന്നും പോൾ തേലക്കാട്ട് വിമർശിച്ചിരുന്നു. ഈ സാഹചര്യത്തിലാണ് ഈ വിഷയം സിനഡ് ചർച്ച ചെയ്തത്.

"സഭാ നേതൃത്വത്തിനും പ്രബോധനങ്ങൾക്കുമെതിരായി പരസ്യമായ നിലപാട് സ്വീകരിക്കുന്നവരുടെ അച്ചടക്ക ലംഘനങ്ങൾക്കെതിരെ സഭാനിയമം അനുശാസിക്കുന്ന അച്ചടക്ക നടപടികൾ സ്വീകരിക്കാൻ ബന്ധപ്പെട്ട രൂപതാധ്യക്ഷന്മാർക്ക് നിർദേശം നൽകി. ഇതു പ്രകാരം, 'സത്യദീപ'ത്തിന്റെയും ഫാ. പോൾ തേലക്കാട്ടിന്റെയും അച്ചടക്കലംഘനങ്ങൾക്കും സഭാ വിരുദ്ധ പ്രബോധനങ്ങൾക്കുമെതിരെ നടപടികൾ സ്വീകരിക്കേണ്ട ഉത്തരവാദിത്തം എറണാകുളം- അങ്കമാലി അതിരൂപതാ ആർച്ച് ബിഷപ്പും മെത്രാപ്പോലീത്തൻ വികാരിയുമായ മാർ ആന്റണി കരിയിലിനാണ്.'

സത്യത്തിൽ,എന്താണ് പോൾ തേലക്കാട്ട് ചെയ്തത് ?

ഇക്കഴിഞ്ഞ നവംബറിൽ വത്തിക്കാൻ പരസ്യപ്പെടുത്തിയ മക് കാരിക് ( Mc Carrick ) റിപ്പോർട്ട്,ജോൺ പോൾ രണ്ടാമൻറെ വിശുദ്ധ പദവിയിൽ കരിനിഴൽ വീഴ്ത്തുന്നു എന്നാണ് തേലക്കാട്ട് എഴുതിയത്.അത് സത്യമാണ്.

മുൻ അമേരിക്കൻ കർദിനാൾ തിയഡോർ മക് കാരിക് സ്വവർഗാനുരാഗി ആയിരുന്നെന്ന ആരോപണത്തെപ്പറ്റി വത്തിക്കാൻ നടത്തിയ ആഭ്യന്തര അന്വേഷണ റിപ്പോർട്ട് ഫ്രാൻസിസ് മാർപാപ്പയ്ക്ക് കിട്ടിയത് 2018 ലാണ്.449 പേജുള്ള റിപ്പോർട്ട് ആണത്.കുറെ മെത്രാന്മാരും കർദിനാൾമാരും മാർപാപ്പമാരും മക് കാർമിക് സെമിനാരി അന്തേവാസികളുമായി കിടക്ക പങ്കിട്ടു എന്ന ആരോപണം കണ്ടില്ലെന്ന് നടിക്കുകയോ തള്ളിക്കളയുകയോ ചെയ്തു എന്നാണ് മക് കാരിക് അന്വേഷണ റിപ്പോർട്ടിലുള്ളത്.അതിൻറെ വെളിച്ചത്തിൽ,ഫ്രാൻസിസ് മാർപാപ്പ,നവതി ഘോഷിച്ച മക് കാരിക്കിനെ പുറത്താക്കി.തിരു വസ്ത്രം ഊരി.ഒരു അൾത്താര ബാലൻറെ ഏറ്റു പറച്ചിൽ വരെ ഫ്രാൻസിസ് മാർപാപ്പയും നടപടിക്ക് തുനിഞ്ഞില്ല.

പുരോഹിതരുടെ ലൈംഗിക അരാജകത്വം കാരണം പ്രതിസന്ധി നേരിടുന്ന സഭയ്ക്ക് വിശ്വാസ്യത നൽകാനും സുതാര്യത കൊണ്ട് വരാനും വേണ്ടിയായിരുന്നു,ഈ അന്വേഷണം.

ജോൺ പോളും മക് കാരിക്കും 

കത്തോലിക്കാ സഭയിൽ മക് കാരിക്കിന്റെ ആരോഹണത്തെ സംബന്ധിച്ച് സ്ഫോടനാത്മകമായ വിവരങ്ങളാണ്,റിപ്പോർട്ടിലുള്ളത്.2014 ൽ വാഴ്ത്തപ്പെട്ടവനായ ജോൺ പോൾ രണ്ടാമൻ മക് കാരിക്കിന്റെ അഭ്യുദയകാംക്ഷി ആയിരുന്നു എന്ന് മാത്രമല്ല,2000 ൽ അയാളെ വാഷിങ്ടൺ ആർച്ച് ബിഷപ്പാക്കിയതും തൊട്ടടുത്ത വർഷം കർദിനാൾ ആക്കിയതും ജോൺ പോൾ രണ്ടാമൻ ആയിരുന്നു.മക് കാരിക് സെമിനാരി കുട്ടികളെ ലൈംഗികമായി ഉപയോഗിച്ചു എന്ന് സ്ഥിരീകരണം കിട്ടിയ ശേഷമായിരുന്നു,ഇത്.വത്തിക്കാൻ അന്വേഷണത്തെക്കാൾ,ജോൺ പോൾ രണ്ടാമൻ മക് കാരിക്കിന്റെ നിഷേധങ്ങളെ വിശ്വസിച്ചുവെന്ന് റിപ്പോർട്ട് പറയുന്നു."ജോൺ പോൾ രണ്ടാമൻ വ്യക്തിപരമായി മക് കാരിക്കിന്റെ നിയമനത്തിൽ താൽപര്യം എടുത്തു.അറ്റ്ലാന്റിക്കിന് ഇരു വശവുമുള്ള വിശ്വസ്ത ഉപദേഷ്ടാക്കൾ മുന്നറിയിപ്പ് നൽകിയിട്ടും,അദ്ദേഹം ആ തീരുമാനമെടുത്തു",മക് കാരിക് അന്വേഷണ റിപ്പോർട്ടിൽ കുറ്റപ്പെടുത്തുന്നു.

ദ്യൂഷ് വെൽ ( DW ) എന്ന ജർമൻ ആഗോള ഇംഗ്ലീഷ് മാധ്യമത്തിന്റെ മത വിദഗ്ദ്ധൻ ക്രിസ്റ്റോഫ് സ്റ്റാർക് ഇങ്ങനെ നിരീക്ഷിച്ചു:"ആഴമേറിയ ഈ ലൈംഗിക കുംഭകോണത്തിൽ സഭയുടെ യാഥാസ്ഥിതികരായ ഉന്നതരും പെട്ടു;അതിവേഗം വിശുദ്ധനാക്കപ്പെട്ട ജോൺ പോൾ രണ്ടാമന് മേൽ അത് കരിനിഴൽ വീഴ്ത്തി."

ഇത്,തേലക്കാട്ട് ഉദ്ധരിച്ചതായിരിക്കാം.

മക് കാരിക് അമേരിക്കയിലും പുറത്തും വലിയ സ്വാധീനമുള്ള പുരോഹിതൻ ആയിരുന്നു;സഭയുടെ ഏറ്റവും വലിയ പണ സമാഹർത്താവും ആയിരുന്നു.ബെനഡിക്ട് പതിനാറാമൻ 2016 ൽ മക് കാരിക്കിന് വിരമിക്കൽ വിധിച്ചു."തുടർന്നും ആരോപണങ്ങൾ കിട്ടിയിട്ടും അന്വേഷണത്തിന് ഉത്തരവിട്ടില്ല.കാര്യങ്ങൾ മക് കാരിക്കിന്റെ മനഃസാക്ഷിക്ക് വിടുകയാണ് ചെയ്തത്.സഭയുടെ നന്മയ്ക്ക് വേണ്ടി ഒതുങ്ങിയിരിക്കാനും യാത്രകൾ ഒഴിവാക്കാനും നിർദേശിച്ചു",മക് കാരിക് അന്വേഷണ റിപ്പോർട്ടിൽ പറയുന്നു.

കുട്ടികളെ മാത്രമല്ല,മുതിർന്നവരെയും ലൈംഗികമായി ഉപയോഗിച്ചു എന്ന അന്വേഷണ റിപ്പോർട്ട് വന്ന ശേഷമാണ്,ഫ്രാൻസിസ് മാർപാപ്പ,മക് കാരിക്കിന്റെ സഭാവസ്ത്രം ഊരിയത്.90 വർഷത്തിനിടയിൽ ഒരു കർദിനാളിനെ ഇങ്ങനെ ശിക്ഷിക്കുന്നത്,ആദ്യമായിരുന്നു.പൂർവഗാമികൾ ചെയ്തത് ശരിയായിരിക്കും എന്ന് ഫ്രാൻസിസ് മാർപാപ്പയും ധരിച്ചിരുന്നു.അപ്പോഴാണ് എഴുപതുകളിൽ 18 വയസിൽ താഴെയുള്ള അൾത്താര ബാലൻറെ കഥ അറിഞ്ഞത്.

അമേരിക്കയിൽ പുരോഹിതരുടെ ദുരുപയോഗം അതിജീവിച്ചവരുടെ സംഘടനയുണ്ട് -Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests (SNAP).സഭാ ചരിത്രത്തിൽ ആദ്യമായി,ഒരു മൂന്നാം കക്ഷിയെ,വൈദികൻ അല്ലാത്ത അഭിഭാഷകനെ വച്ചാണ് മക് കാരിക് അന്വേഷണം നടത്തിയതെന്നും ഇത് മാതൃകാപരമാണെന്നും ഈ സംഘടന ചൂണ്ടിക്കാട്ടിയിരുന്നു.ദശാബ്ദങ്ങൾ കുട്ടികളെ അപകടത്തിലാക്കിയ ഒരു സംവിധാനത്തെയാണ് അന്വേഷണം പുറത്തു കൊണ്ട് വന്നത്.

ഇത്,തേലക്കാട്ട് എഴുതിയതിൽ ഒരു തെറ്റും ഇല്ല.ചില മാർപാപ്പമാരെക്കാൾ എന്തുകൊണ്ടും ഭേദമായിരിക്കും,ഒരു അടയ്ക്കാ രാജു.



© Ramachandran

Saturday, 2 January 2021

LAWRENCE OF ARABIA IN THRISSUR

Here is the screen shot of the story written by me in the Times of India,dated 02 January 2021,on Lawrence of Arabia's visit to Kerala in 1921.


Thursday, 24 December 2020

LAWRENCE OF ARABIA AND THE MAPPILA REBELLION

He was in Kerala Just Prior to the Rebellion

What was Lawrence of Arabia doing in Kerala,during the run upto the Mopah Rebellion of 1921? The lore is that he had been here for an ayurvedic treatment,at Trichur.It has to be remembered that Trichur was the place where the dress rehersal for the rebellion was actually held.A spy like T E Lawrence will never sit idle with Ashtavaidyan Thaikkattu Mooss,nor he is going to reveal wgatever design he has,to the Mooss,who was treating him.Lawrence then,was the guest of K Govinda Menon,Forest Conservator,who had been his classmate at Oxford.Lawrence was the person who instigated the Arabs to rebel against the Khalifa,the Turkish Sultan during the first World War;in Malabar,during the Khilafath movement,the Moplahs had risen in favour of the Sultan,whom Lawrence had toppled.Every reason for him to be here,in Kerala.

For movie buffs, who have seen David Lean’s classic Lawrence of Arabia, Thomas Edward Lawrence, immortalised by Peter O’Toole, is the dashing British leader dressed in white and gold Arab robes. But the real Lawrence was not exactly the heroic character of the 1962 film. He was certainly one of the most colourful figures of the First World War, but Lawrence was also controversial with strange fetishes.

Libraries across the world house comprehensive research and archival materials on Lawrence and much of his story is well known. What is not known and what the shelves in the libraries may not tell you is the record of a personal journey Lawrence undertook to Kerala sometime in 1920-21.

This trip was immediately after the first world War. Lawrence who played a leading role as adviser to Emir Faisal of Hejaz,(which is now Saudi Arabia ),during the Arab revolt against Turkish rule (1916–1918) was clearly torn between his British and Arab sympathies. He suffered a huge setback, 'a stinging humiliation that plunged him into a phase of depression'. To recover from this he accepted an invitation from K. Govinda Menon (Conservator of Forests, Cochin State), his classmate at Oxford, to travel to Trichur.The so called depression may have been an alibi.
T E Lawrence

“He stayed for 21 days in Trichur for an elaborate Ayurveda treatment which was supervised by the famous Thaikkattu Mooss. He went on his mandatory evening walks, ate home-made food and left a cheerful man. This must have been Lawrence’s only visit to India,” says V. N. Venugopal, grandson of Govinda Menon and the inheritor of those memories, rare photographs and an autographed book. They remain the only surviving link between ‘Lawrence of Arabia’ and Kerala.Venugopal,who worked in Premier Tyres,had been Secretary of the Kerala Fine Arts Society,Kochi.

Venugopal first came to know about Lawrence when he was studying for his Intermediate at Maharaja’s College, Ernakulam. “We had an essay on ‘Lawrence of Arabia’ by Winston Churchill from his book Great Contemporaries. When I read this essay aloud at home my father (P. Narayana Menon) who was listening asked me what I was reading. He showed me a book that was autographed by the same ‘Lawrence of Arabia’ and the other memorabilia connected with the man. I was stunned because I was reading about an icon and I come to know that my father knew this man, accompanied him on his evening walks when he came to stay at our ancestral home at Trichur. It was so surreal.”

It was Venugopal’s grandmother (Ammu Amma) who told him a lot about Lawrence’s Trichur visit. “She used to narrate stories graphically. One of them was about Lawrence. About how she and my grandfather travelled by the Boat Mail train from Trichur to Dhanushkodi and took a boat to Colombo to pick up Lawrence. He had reached there and the three of them travelled back to Trichur.”

Trichur was a small village in those days. A few Europeans had settled here, most of them planters. “There were rubber plantations at Pudukkad and Amballur managed by Europeans who used to stay at Trichur. They even had an English Club. So, Lawrence was not looked upon as a stranger here.”

On his return to England, Lawrence sent Govinda Menon an autographed copy of Letters of Lawrence. The book has a photograph of Lawrence with his four brothers and on one of the pages, yellowed by time, has the words, ‘In memory of happy days.’

Venugopal treasures photographs of his grandfather and Lawrence shot during their Oxford days (1910-1913). “My grandfather was very close to the Lawrence family. He was almost like a member of the family. After Lawrence’s death his mother sent my grandfather the Bible she had probably gifted to her son, and his brother Montague sent him a copy of Lawrence’s seminal work,Seven Pillars of Wisdom.

Colonel Thomas Edward Lawrence,  ( 1888 –  1935), a British archaeologist, army-officer, diplomat, and writer, became renowned for his role in the Arab Revolt (1916–1918) and the Sinai and Palestine Campaign (1915–1918) against the Ottoman Empire during the First World War.He was born (out of wedlock) in August 1888 to Sarah Junner (1861 - 1959), a governess, and Thomas Chapman (1846 - 1919), an Anglo-Irish nobleman. Chapman left his wife and family in Ireland to cohabit with Junner. Chapman and Junner called themselves Mr and Mrs Lawrence, using the surname of Sarah's likely father; her mother had been employed as a servant for a Lawrence family when she became pregnant with Sarah. In 1896 the Lawrences moved to Oxford, where Thomas attended the High School and then studied history at Jesus College, Oxford from 1907 to 1910. Between 1910 and 1914 he worked as an archaeologist for the British Museum, chiefly at Carchemish in Ottoman Syria.

Soon after the outbreak of war in 1914 he volunteered for the British Army and was stationed at the Arab Bureau (established in 1916) intelligence unit in Egypt. In 1916 he travelled to Mesopotamia and to Arabia on intelligence missions and quickly became involved with the Arab Revolt as a liaison to the Arab forces, along with other British officers, supporting the Arab Kingdom of Hejaz's independence war against its former overlord, the Ottoman Empire. He worked closely with Emir Faisal, a leader of the revolt, and he participated, sometimes as leader, in military actions against the Ottoman armed forces, culminating in the capture of Damascus in October 1918.

After the First World War, Lawrence joined the British Foreign Office, working with the British government and with Faisal.

Following the outbreak of hostilities in August 1914, Lawrence did not immediately enlist in the British Army. He held back until October on the advice of S. F. Newcombe, when he was commissioned on the General List. Before the end of the year, he was summoned by renowned archaeologist and historian Lt. Cmdr. David Hogarth, his mentor at Carchemish, to the new Arab Bureau intelligence unit in Cairo, and he arrived in Cairo on 15 December 1914. The Bureau's chief was General Gilbert Clayton who reported to Egyptian High Commissioner Henry McMahon.

The situation was complex during 1915. There was a growing Arab-nationalist movement within the Arabic-speaking Ottoman territories, including many Arabs serving in the Ottoman armed forces. They were in contact with Sharif Hussein, Emir of Mecca, who was negotiating with the British and offering to lead an Arab uprising against the Ottomans. In exchange, he wanted a British guarantee of an independent Arab state including the Hejaz, Syria, and Mesopotamia. Such an uprising would have been very helpful to Britain in its war against the Ottomans, greatly lessening the threat against the Suez Canal. However, there was resistance from French diplomats who insisted that Syria's future was as a French colony, not an independent Arab state. There were also strong objections from the Government of India, which was nominally part of the British government but acted independently. Its vision was of Mesopotamia under British control serving as a granary for India; furthermore, it wanted to hold on to its Arabian outpost in Aden.

At the Arab Bureau, Lawrence supervised the preparation of maps, produced a daily bulletin for the British generals operating in the theatre, and interviewed prisoners.He was an advocate of a British landing at Alexandretta which never came to pass. He was also a consistent advocate of an independent Arab Syria.

Lawrence with Govinda Menon

The situation came to a crisis in October 1915, as Sharif Hussein demanded an immediate commitment from Britain, with the threat that he would otherwise throw his weight behind the Ottomans. This would create a credible Pan-Islamic message that could have been very dangerous for Britain, which was in severe difficulties in the Gallipoli Campaign. The British replied with a letter from High Commissioner McMahon that was generally agreeable while reserving commitments concerning the Mediterranean coastline and Holy Land.

In the spring of 1916, Lawrence was dispatched to Mesopotamia to assist in relieving the Siege of Kut by some combination of starting an Arab uprising and bribing Ottoman officials. This mission produced no useful result. Meanwhile, the Sykes–Picot Agreement was being negotiated in London without the knowledge of British officials in Cairo, which awarded a large proportion of Syria to France. Further, it implied that the Arabs would have to conquer Syria's four great cities if they were to have any sort of state there: Damascus, Homs, Hama, and Aleppo. It is unclear at what point Lawrence became aware of the treaty's contents.

The Arab Revolt began in June 1916, but it bogged down after a few successes, with a real risk that the Ottoman forces would advance along the coast of the Red Sea and recapture Mecca. On 16 October 1916, Lawrence was sent to the Hejaz on an intelligence-gathering mission led by Ronald Storrs. He interviewed Sharif Hussein's sons Ali, Abdullah, and Faisal, and he concluded that Faisal was the best candidate to lead the Revolt.

In November, S. F. Newcombe was assigned to lead a permanent British liaison to Faisal's staff. Newcombe had not yet arrived in the area and the matter was of some urgency, so Lawrence was sent in his place. In late December 1916, Faisal and Lawrence worked out a plan for repositioning the Arab forces to prevent the Ottoman forces around Medina from threatening Arab positions and putting the railway from Syria under threat. Newcombe arrived and Lawrence was preparing to leave Arabia, but Faisal intervened urgently, asking that Lawrence's assignment become permanent.

Lawrence's most important contributions to the Arab Revolt were in the area of strategy and liaison with British armed forces, but he also participated personally in several military engagements.Lawrence made a 300-mile personal journey northward in June 1917, on the way to Aqaba, visiting Ras Baalbek, the outskirts of Damascus, and Azraq, Jordan. He met Arab nationalists, counselling them to avoid revolt until the arrival of Faisal's forces, and he attacked a bridge to create the impression of guerrilla activity. His findings were regarded by the British as extremely valuable and there was serious consideration of awarding him a Victoria Cross; in the end, he was invested as a Companion of the Order of the Bath and promoted to Major.

Lawrence travelled regularly between British headquarters and Faisal, co-ordinating military action. But by early 1918, Faisal's chief British liaison was Colonel Pierce Charles Joyce, and Lawrence's time was chiefly devoted to raiding and intelligence-gathering.The chief elements of the Arab strategy which Faisal and Lawrence developed were to avoid capturing Medina, and to extend northwards through Maan and Dera'a to Damascus and beyond. Faisal wanted to lead regular attacks against the Ottomans, but Lawrence persuaded him to drop that tactic. Lawrence wrote about the Bedouin as a fighting force:

The value of the tribes is defensive only and their real sphere is guerilla warfare. They are intelligent, and very lively, almost reckless, but too individualistic to endure commands, or fight in line, or to help each other. It would, I think, be possible to make an organized force out of them.… The Hejaz war is one of dervishes against regular forces—and we are on the side of the dervishes. Our text-books do not apply to its conditions at all.

Medina was an attractive target for the revolt as Islam's second holiest site, and because its Ottoman garrison was weakened by disease and isolation. It became clear that it was advantageous to leave it there rather than try to capture it, while continually attacking the Hejaz railway south from Damascus without permanently destroying it.This prevented the Ottomans from making effective use of their troops at Medina, and forced them to dedicate many resources to defending and repairing the railway line.

Trichur house where Lawrence stayed

It is not known when Lawrence learned the details of the Sykes-Picot Agreement, nor if or when he briefed Faisal on what he knew, However, there is good reason to think that both these things happened, and earlier rather than later. In particular, the Arab strategy of northward extension makes perfect sense given the Sykes-Picot language that spoke of an independent Arab entity in Syria, which would only be granted if the Arabs liberated the territory themselves. The French, and some of their British Liaison officers, were specifically uncomfortable about the northward movement, as it would weaken French colonial claim.

In 1917, Lawrence proposed a joint action with the Arab irregulars and forces including Auda Abu Tayi, who had previously been in the employ of the Ottomans, against the strategically located but lightly defended town of Aqaba on the Red Sea. Aqaba could have been attacked from the sea, but the narrow defiles leading through the mountains were strongly defended and would have been very difficult to assault. The expedition was led by Sharif Nasir of Medina.
Akbar Jehan

Lawrence carefully avoided informing his British superiors about the details of the planned inland attack, due to concern that it would be blocked as contrary to French interests. The expedition departed from Wejh on 9 May, and Aqaba fell to the Arab forces on 6 July, after a surprise overland attack which took the Turkish defences from behind. After Aqaba, General Sir Edmund Allenby, the new commander-in-chief of the Egyptian Expeditionary Force, agreed to Lawrence's strategy for the revolt. Lawrence now held a powerful position as an adviser to Faisal and a person who had Allenby's confidence, as Allenby acknowledged after the war:

I gave him a free hand. His cooperation was marked by the utmost loyalty, and I never had anything but praise for his work, which, indeed, was invaluable throughout the campaign. He was the mainspring of the Arab movement and knew their language, their manners and their mentality.

Lawrence describes an episode on 20 November 1917 while reconnoitering Dera'a in disguise, when he was captured by the Ottoman military, heavily beaten, and sexually abused by the local bey and his guardsmen, though he does not specify the nature of the sexual contact. Some scholars have stated that he exaggerated the severity of the injuries that he suffered, or alleged that the episode never actually happened. There is no independent testimony, but the multiple consistent reports and the absence of evidence for outright invention in Lawrence's works make the account believable to his biographers. Malcolm Brown, John E. Mack, and Jeremy Wilson have argued that this episode had strong psychological effects on Lawrence, which may explain some of his unconventional behaviour in later life. Lawrence ended his account of the episode in Seven Pillars of Wisdom with the statement: "In Dera'a that night the citadel of my integrity had been irrevocably lost.

Lawrence was involved in the build-up to the capture of Damascus in the final weeks of the war, but he was not present at the city's formal surrender, much to his disappointment. He arrived several hours after the city had fallen, entering Damascus around 9 am on 1 October 1918; the first to arrive was the 10th Australian Light Horse Brigade led by Major A. C. N. "Harry" Olden, who formally accepted the surrender of the city from acting Governor Emir Said. Lawrence was instrumental in establishing a provisional Arab government under Faisal in newly liberated Damascus, which he had envisioned as the capital of an Arab state. Faisal's rule as king, however, came to an abrupt end in 1920, after the battle of Maysaloun when the French Forces of General Gouraud entered Damascus under the command of General Mariano Goybet, destroying Lawrence's dream of an independent Arabia.

During the closing years of the war, Lawrence sought to convince his superiors in the British government that Arab independence was in their interests, but he met with mixed success. The secret Sykes-Picot Agreement between France and Britain contradicted the promises of independence that he had made to the Arabs and frustrated his work.

Lawrence returned to the United Kingdom a full colonel. Immediately after the war, he worked for the Foreign Office, attending the Paris Peace Conference between January and May as a member of Faisal's delegation. On 17 May 1919, a Handley Page Type O/400 taking Lawrence to Egypt crashed at the airport of Roma-Centocelle. The pilot and co-pilot were killed; Lawrence survived with a broken shoulder blade and two broken ribs.During his brief hospitalisation, he was visited by King Victor Emmanuel III of Italy.

Lawrence served as an advisor to Winston Churchill at the Colonial Office for just over a year starting in February 1920.He hated bureaucratic work, writing on 21 May 1921 to Robert Graves: "I wish I hadn't gone out there: the Arabs are like a page I have turned over; and sequels are rotten things. I'm locked up here: office every day and much of it".He travelled to the Middle East on multiple occasions during this period, at one time holding the title of "chief political officer for Trans-Jordania".

In August 1922, Lawrence enlisted in the Royal Air Force as an aircraftman, under the name John Hume Ross. At the RAF recruiting centre in Covent Garden, London, he was interviewed by recruiting officer Flying Officer W. E. Johns, later known as the author of the Biggles series of novels. Johns rejected Lawrence's application, as he suspected that "Ross" was a false name. Lawrence admitted that this was so and that he had provided false documents. He left, but returned some time later with an RAF messenger who carried a written order that Johns must accept Lawrence.

However, Lawrence was forced out of the RAF in February 1923 after his identity was exposed. He changed his name to T. E. Shaw (apparently as a consequence of his friendship with G. B. and Charlotte Shaw and joined the Royal Tank Corps later that year. He was unhappy there and repeatedly petitioned to rejoin the RAF, which finally readmitted him in August 1925.A fresh burst of publicity after the publication of Revolt in the Desert resulted in his assignment to bases at Karachi and Miramshah in British India (now Pakistan) in late 1926,where he remained until the end of 1928. At that time, he was forced to return to Britain after rumours began to circulate that he was involved in espionage activities.

The Note to Govinda Menon,after Trichur days

The one important aspect of Lwrence was that,he was a double agent.Hence,it has to be investigated whom he represented when he came to Trichur,in Kerala,if he came as a spy.M P Narayana Menon,who as a Congress,Khlafat leader of Manjeri,was then travelling dressed like a Mappila Thangal,imitating,Lawrence.People called him,Mappila Menon.When Variyankunnatth Kunjahammad Haji looted the Namboothiri Bank at Manjeri,on 24 August 1921,in a speech at the ceremony,Menon had promised Mappilas,'outside help",according to the judgement,deporting him for life.Out side help from where? The Indian Communist Party formed in Tashkent,just prior to the Moplah rebellion had Indian Muhajirs,as its founding members.The muhajirs had left India,and where on their way to Turkey,to fight for the Sultan and redeem the Khalifate.The Soviet Union had plans to use King Amanulla of Afganisthan to help transport weapons to India for a revolution,but Amanulla had gone back on his promise,at the intervension of the British.Cecil Kaye,the British Intelligence Chief in India,has recorded that,M N Roy,the founding father of the Indian Communist Party,had a role in the Moplah rebellion.Abani Mukherjee,who founded the party alongwith him,had been in India during the rebellion,and had given a document on the rebellion to Lenin in October,1921.Mukherjee was a member of the Soviet Party.

After the discovery of oil in the middle east, the British were eager to break-up the Arab Islamic bloc. The ottomans had ruled a large area including the present Syria, Iraq, Jordan and Palestine for 400 years. Turkey sided with Germany in WW1. After its defeat the allies fell upon its carcass and divided it up between them. The British proclaimed Ibn Saud the ruler of Hejaz and by way of consolation Hussein's sons Abdullah and Faisal assumed the thrones of newly created kingdoms Jordan and Iraq in 1921.

By the mid-1920s Ibn Saud established Saudi Arabia in an orgy of murder. Numerous rebellions against the House of Saud subsequently took place, each put down in mass killings of mostly innocent victims, including women and children. The territory was divided into districts under the control of Saud’s relatives, a situation which largely prevails today.

When the British were desperate to topple King Anamullah they brought Lawrence in January 1927. He wandered around, disguised as an exiled Afghan Prince and cleric Pir Karam Shah and as TE Shaw at RAF base in Karachi. He became intimate with the tribes due to his knowledge in Arabic which tribesmen saw as divine language. During his stay, he fully naturalized with the local customs, dress and food habits. Subsequently he began to distribute money and arms among the tribes and provoked them against Amanulla.

Michael Adam Nedou was an architect from Dubrovnik (now in Croatia but was part of the Austro-Hungarian Empire during 1880s). Nedou opened smart hotels in Lahore (which is now Avari) and then in the Kashmiri ski resort of Gulmarg. Nedou’s hotel was the only premier hotel in Srinagar. The visiting British dignitaries, businessmen and maharajas of different princely states were regulars at Nedou’s in Kashmir. His son, Harry Nedou, married a Gujjar woman, Mir Jan. 

The black propaganda campaign with religious fervour among the more reactionary tribes provoked a civil war. In Srinagar, Lawrence started giving sermons in the Hazratbal mosque as Pir Karam Shah.

He flirted with the daughter of then famous Nedous hotel, Akbar Jehan. Her father insisted that they get married immediately; which they did. 

Three months later, in January 1929, Amanulla was toppled and replaced by a pro-British ruler. Within a few days, the imperialist Civil and Military Gazette, published comparative profiles of Lawrence and Karam Shah to reinforce the impression that they were two different people. Several weeks later, the Calcutta newspaper Liberty reported that Karam Shah was indeed the British spy Lawrence and gave a detailed account of his activities in Waziristan on the Afghan frontier. Because of this information leak, Lawrence became a liability and the authorities told him to return to Britain. 

Akbar Jehan (the desi version of Mata Hari) became alarmed about the secret movements of Lawrence and informed her father about the real identity of Pir Karam Shah. Henry Nedou called wrestlers Gama Pehlwan and his brother Imam Bakhsh Pehlwan from Amritsar to beat the impostor into pulp. They overpowered Lawrence of Arabia and forced him to write a Muslim talaq to Akbar Jehan. 

Nedous insisted on a divorce. Lawrence obliged. Karam Shah was never seen again.Akbar Jehan married Sheikh Abdullah,who became Chief Minister of Jammu and Kashmir.

It is evident from T E Lawrence Studies,Ouline Chronology that he was in Kerala during May-June 1921,because,these two months are missing in the chronology.It is the time of Idavappathi,suitable for ayurvedic treatment in Kerala.

The judgement deporting M P Narayana Menon is emphatic that the seed for the 1921 rebellion was sown in the 28 April 1920, fifth Malabar District Political Conference held at Manjeri presided over by S. Kasturiranga Iyengar, Editor of The Hindu. Annie Besant and her followers had walked out of the meeting,protesting against Gandhi's call for no co-operation.M P Narayana Menon,Secretary of the eranad Khilafat Committee, vehemently opposed and spoke against Ms Besant.

It was the Vadakra meet of the Indian National Congress,which took the decision to hold the next meet at Manjeri.C Achutha Menon,Pleader,represented Manavedan Raja of the Nilambur Palace at the Vadakara meet and requested for a meet at Manjeri.K Madhavan Nair,Secretary of the Congress,M P Narayana Menon and Kattilasseri Muhammad Musaliyar were given the responsibility to hold the Manjeri meet.This meet was distinct by the participation of hundreds of mappilas.Only the wealty had participated in the eralier meets.It was conducted at Palliyali Paramb,the Boys' High School ground.

Lawrence in 1919

Ms Annie Besant inaugurated the Malabar branch of the Theosophical Society,in the morning.Three reolutions were taken up at the Political meet:Montague-Chelmsford reforms,Tenancy issue and Khilafat issue.K P Raman Menon moved the on on reforms;Annie Besant opposed.C N ( Manjeri ) Rama Iyer,Nilambur Raja,M K Acharya and P A Krishna Menon supported Ms Besant.She walked out,when the resolution was passed with the crowding of the mappilas.17 members of the Nilambur royal family were massacred by the mappilas in 1921.

The Moplah rebellion broke out on 20 August 1921 at Manjeri.Its dress rehearsal was held in Trichur,in February.Yakoob Hassan,Khilafat leader of Madras,K Madhavan Nair,U Gopala Menon and P Moitheen Koya were arrested in Calicut on 16 February,for violating the prohibitary orders.A meeting to congratulate those leaders were held at Thekkinkad Maithan at Trichur on 20 February,organized by the Congress.This meet was attacked by the pro - British Christians.A fresh meet was held on 26 February,in which Paliath Kunjunni Achan delivered the non co-operation speech.The very next day the Christans held a loyalty procession,in which around 1500 Christians took part.This procession was blocked by the muslims,when it approched the mosque.The Muslims and Christians came to blows;some muslim houses and shops were burnt by the christians.C R Iyyunni addressed the christians,at the end of the processon.

Christians on the East and Congress Hindus and muslims on the West became two warring factions.Dr A R Menon led the Hindus.Dewan T Raghavachari reached the city.The christians attacked the hindus on 1 March,and houses and shops were destroyed.The Congress-Hindu leaders sought the halp of the Malabar mappilas-a large group of mappilas from Pokkottoor reached Trichur on 2 March and camped at the Devaswam inn.They held a procession,with loud calls of Takbir.The city was terrorized.British Resident H H Burkitt and the Dewan called the rival factions,in which both of them agreed for a cease-fire.The mappilas returned,after holding a victory procession.They rose after five months in Malabar.

There is an unconfirmed report which says T E Lawrence had been to Kerala twice;I could confirm only one.Maybe there is a lot more in classified British secret dossiers.

Later, Lawrence gave up his colonial title, joined the Royal Air Force as a messenger boy and changed his name to T.E. Shaw. It was an effort to disguise his celebrityhood, an attempt at anonymity,which all spies prefer. Still hounded by the limelight, he planned to retire to his dream home, Clouds Hill, when he died in a motorcycle accident.

That Lawrence was married to Sheikh Abdullah's wife,has been denied by Nyla Ali Khan,in her book on Akbar Jehan,The Life of a Kashmiri Woman.Akbar Jehan,incidentally,is her grand mother.But in the book,she has failed to counter certain perceptions about Akbar Jehan.Former Director of Intelligence Burau,B N Mullick,in his book,My Years with Nehru,projects Akbar Jehan as the main beneficiary of Pakistani fundsthat flowed in to support The Plebiscite Front from 1954 when she died.The xerox copies of the receipts signed by 'Zeeanatul Islam ' are part of Mullick's book and 'Zeenatul Islam' was Akbar Jehan's code name.Simmilarly,Ghulam Ahmad,a confidant of Sheikh Abdullah,in his book,My Years with Sheikh Abdullah,has accused Akbar Jehan of forcing her husband to throw open the doors for corruption,nepotism and favouritism.Nobody has discussed whether Sheikh Abdullah infact,was the son of Motilal Nehru.


© Ramachandran 


FEATURED POST

BAMBOO AND BUTTERFLY: A MALABAR WOMAN FOR BRITISH RESIDENT

The Amazing Life of a Thiyya Woman S he shared three males,among them a British Resident and a British Doctor.The Resident's British ...